{"id":6164,"date":"2025-03-03T09:06:06","date_gmt":"2025-03-03T07:06:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-712-8174-23-dated-18-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-03T09:06:06","modified_gmt":"2025-03-03T07:06:06","slug":"case-no-712-8174-23-dated-18-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-712-8174-23-dated-18-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 712\/8174\/23 dated 18\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Exemption from Criminal Liability of Investigator PERSON_8 Due to Expiration of Statute of Limitations for Charges of Illegal Detention of Activists During 2014 Events.<\/p>\n<p>The court clearly determined that when exempting a person from criminal liability under Article 49 of the Criminal Code (expiration of statute of limitations), there is no need to establish the fact of a criminal offense committed by the person. The main conditions are: expiration of terms, absence of new crimes, and non-evasion from investigation.<\/p>\n<p>Main Court Arguments:<br \/>\n1. Criminal offenses occurred on January 23-24, 2014, with the indictment drafted only on August 07, 2023, i.e., after 9 years.<br \/>\n2. Statute of limitations has expired, therefore the court is obligated to exempt the person from criminal liability.<br \/>\n3. PERSON_8 agreed to exemption, so the court made the corresponding decision.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: Maintain the exemption of PERSON_8 from criminal liability and attribute expert examination costs to the state.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125435248\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Exemption from Criminal Liability of Investigator PERSON_8 Due to Expiration of Statute of Limitations for Charges of Illegal Detention of Activists During 2014 Events. The court clearly determined that when exempting a person from criminal liability under Article 49 of the Criminal Code (expiration of statute of limitations), there is no need&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6164","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6164","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6164"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6164\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6164"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6164"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}