{"id":6152,"date":"2025-03-02T09:23:48","date_gmt":"2025-03-02T07:23:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-580-5664-23-dated-26-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-02T09:23:48","modified_gmt":"2025-03-02T07:23:48","slug":"case-no-580-5664-23-dated-26-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-580-5664-23-dated-26-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 580\/5664\/23 dated 26\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Dispute regarding the refusal of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine to provide a military pensioner with an updated certificate on the amount of monetary allowance for pension recalculation.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; The right to pension recalculation arises when the amount of monetary allowance for military personnel changes<br \/>\n&#8211; The court deviates from previous practice regarding the application of the subsistence minimum for salary calculations<br \/>\n&#8211; National Guard servicemembers have the right to pension recalculation using the tariff coefficients of Cabinet of Ministers Resolution No. 704<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Satisfy the cassation appeal, cancel the appellate court ruling and uphold the first instance court decision obligating the Ministry of Internal Affairs to provide an updated certificate on monetary allowance.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125447400\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Dispute regarding the refusal of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine to provide a military pensioner with an updated certificate on the amount of monetary allowance for pension recalculation. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: &#8211; The right to pension recalculation arises when the amount of&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6152","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6152"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6152\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}