{"id":6148,"date":"2025-03-02T09:21:38","date_gmt":"2025-03-02T07:21:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-320-3378-23-dated-26-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-02T09:21:38","modified_gmt":"2025-03-02T07:21:38","slug":"case-no-320-3378-23-dated-26-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-320-3378-23-dated-26-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 320\/3378\/23 dated 26\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: The Prosecutor’s Office attempted to compel the Education Department of the Irpin City Council through court to bring the civil protection shelter into proper condition.<\/p>\n

2. Key Court Arguments:
\n– A prosecutor can represent state interests in court only if the authority does not exercise or improperly exercises interest protection
\n– The State Emergency Service (SES) does not have direct legislative powers to independently file lawsuits regarding bringing protective structures into proper condition
\n– Legislative changes did not provide the SES with a clear right to judicial appeal<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: To leave the prosecutor’s cassation complaint unsatisfied, previous court decisions unchanged.<\/p>\n

Note: The court deviated from the previous legal position of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court from 2019 regarding the possibility of prosecutorial representation in SES cases.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: The Prosecutor’s Office attempted to compel the Education Department of the Irpin City Council through court to bring the civil protection shelter into proper condition. 2. Key Court Arguments: – A prosecutor can represent state interests in court only if the authority does not exercise or improperly…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6148","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6148","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6148"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6148\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6148"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6148"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6148"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}