{"id":6136,"date":"2025-03-02T09:15:53","date_gmt":"2025-03-02T07:15:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-240-35668-23-dated-25-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-02T09:15:53","modified_gmt":"2025-03-02T07:15:53","slug":"case-no-240-35668-23-dated-25-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-240-35668-23-dated-25-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 240\/35668\/23 dated 25\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the Pension Fund&#8217;s refusal to calculate pension for a person affected by the Chornobyl disaster as unlawful, in full scope.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n1. The Constitutional Court of Ukraine previously declared the reduction of pensions for Chornobyl disaster victims unconstitutional.<br \/>\n2. The new law, adopted to implement the Constitutional Court&#8217;s decision, effectively reduced pension amounts again compared to the previous version.<br \/>\n3. The state must ensure comprehensive social protection for persons affected by the Chornobyl disaster, regardless of financial circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The Supreme Court satisfied the claim, obliging the Pension Fund to calculate the pension at the amount of 6 minimum age pensions, as was provided for in the previous version of the law.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125447044\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the Pension Fund&#8217;s refusal to calculate pension for a person affected by the Chornobyl disaster as unlawful, in full scope. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. The Constitutional Court of Ukraine previously declared the reduction of pensions for Chornobyl disaster victims unconstitutional. 2. The new law,&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6136","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6136"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6136\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}