{"id":6134,"date":"2025-03-02T09:15:13","date_gmt":"2025-03-02T07:15:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-718-6-23-dated-19-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-02T09:15:13","modified_gmt":"2025-03-02T07:15:13","slug":"case-no-718-6-23-dated-19-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-718-6-23-dated-19-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 718\/6\/23 dated 19\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of Assignment of Claims under Credit and Mortgage Agreements and Reclamation of Real Estate.<\/p>\n<p>2. Key Court Arguments:<br \/>\n&#8211; The court confirmed the legal position of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court that assignment of claims under a credit agreement in favor of a natural person does not contradict legislation.<br \/>\n&#8211; The plaintiff is not a party to the credit agreement and cannot challenge its terms.<br \/>\n&#8211; Assignment agreements do not violate the plaintiff&#8217;s rights and interests.<br \/>\n&#8211; The credit agreement is not a consumer agreement, therefore special rules on consumer protection do not apply.<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Reject the claim for invalidation of agreements and reclamation of property.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, the court canceled the decision on recovery of court expenses due to procedural violations in its adoption.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125433899\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of Assignment of Claims under Credit and Mortgage Agreements and Reclamation of Real Estate. 2. Key Court Arguments: &#8211; The court confirmed the legal position of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court that assignment of claims under a credit agreement in favor of a natural&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6134","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6134","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6134"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6134\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6134"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6134"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6134"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}