{"id":6098,"date":"2025-03-01T09:30:01","date_gmt":"2025-03-01T07:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-910-16543-23-dated-20-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-01T09:30:01","modified_gmt":"2025-03-01T07:30:01","slug":"case-no-910-16543-23-dated-20-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-910-16543-23-dated-20-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 910\/16543\/23 dated 20\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Analysis of the Court Decision:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of debt under a lease agreement and return of leased immovable property.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; The Defendant (LLC &#8220;DU-2019&#8221;) ceased paying rent from 23.02.2022<br \/>\n&#8211; The contract provides the lessor&#8217;s right to unilateral termination in case of debt<br \/>\n&#8211; The Plaintiff (JSC &#8220;Kyiv Radar Plant&#8221;) sent the defendant a notice of contract termination, which was received on 04.07.2023<br \/>\n&#8211; The court established the legitimacy of unilateral contract termination and the defendant&#8217;s obligation to return the premises<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Partially satisfy the claim &#8211; obligate the defendant to return the leased premises and recover rent debt.<\/p>\n<p>Note: The court deviated from the previous practice of the appellate court regarding the procedure for terminating lease agreements.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125391727\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Analysis of the Court Decision: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of debt under a lease agreement and return of leased immovable property. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: &#8211; The Defendant (LLC &#8220;DU-2019&#8221;) ceased paying rent from 23.02.2022 &#8211; The contract provides the lessor&#8217;s right to unilateral termination in case of debt &#8211; The Plaintiff&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6098","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6098","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6098"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6098\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6098"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6098"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6098"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}