{"id":6096,"date":"2025-03-01T09:28:47","date_gmt":"2025-03-01T07:28:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/03\/case-no-924-498-23-dated-29-01-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-03-01T09:28:47","modified_gmt":"2025-03-01T07:28:47","slug":"case-no-924-498-23-dated-29-01-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/03\/case-no-924-498-23-dated-29-01-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 924\/498\/23 dated 29\/01\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery from JSC “Khmelnytskoblenergo” in favor of LLC “Land Management Company “Privat” of payment under the service agreement in the amount of 7,147,231.86 UAH.<\/p>\n

2. Main Court Arguments:
\n– The agreement is a service agreement, not a contract of work
\n– Expiration of the agreement term does not terminate the parties’ obligations
\n– Impossibility of performing the agreement after its term expiration is not grounds for recovering the full cost of services
\n– The executor had the right to refuse performance of the agreement, but this does not mean the impossibility of its performance<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Leave the court decisions of previous instances unchanged, modifying only the reasoning part of the resolution.<\/p>\n

: The court deviated from the previous practice of qualifying the agreement as a work contract, defining it as a service agreement.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery from JSC “Khmelnytskoblenergo” in favor of LLC “Land Management Company “Privat” of payment under the service agreement in the amount of 7,147,231.86 UAH. 2. Main Court Arguments: – The agreement is a service agreement, not a contract of work – Expiration of the agreement term does…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6096","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6096","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6096"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6096\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6096"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6096"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6096"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}