{"id":6040,"date":"2025-02-28T10:06:12","date_gmt":"2025-02-28T08:06:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-420-28679-23-dated-24-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-28T10:06:12","modified_gmt":"2025-02-28T08:06:12","slug":"case-no-420-28679-23-dated-24-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-420-28679-23-dated-24-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 420\/28679\/23 dated 24\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Prosecutor&#8217;s claim to compel the owner to restore a destroyed local architectural monument in Odesa.<\/p>\n<p>2. Key Court Arguments:<br \/>\n&#8211; The Law of Ukraine &#8220;On Protection of Cultural Heritage&#8221; clearly defines that the cultural heritage protection authority has the right only to file a claim for the purchase of the monument, but not for its restoration<br \/>\n&#8211; The Department of Culture is not empowered to file such a lawsuit<br \/>\n&#8211; The Court deviates from previous practice, which allowed a broader interpretation of government authorities&#8217; powers<br \/>\n&#8211; The prosecutor cannot represent state interests due to the absence of clear legislative grounds<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Terminate the proceedings, as the dispute cannot be considered within the administrative court procedure.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125377905\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Prosecutor&#8217;s claim to compel the owner to restore a destroyed local architectural monument in Odesa. 2. Key Court Arguments: &#8211; The Law of Ukraine &#8220;On Protection of Cultural Heritage&#8221; clearly defines that the cultural heritage protection authority has the right only to file a claim for the&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6040","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6040","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6040"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6040\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6040"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6040"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6040"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}