{"id":5990,"date":"2025-02-27T09:46:12","date_gmt":"2025-02-27T07:46:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-916-3226-23-dated-11-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-27T09:46:12","modified_gmt":"2025-02-27T07:46:12","slug":"case-no-916-3226-23-dated-11-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-916-3226-23-dated-11-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 916\/3226\/23 dated 11\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of Decisions of the General Meeting of the Service Cooperative “Tian Kong” and Related Registration Records.<\/p>\n

2. Main Arguments of the Court:
\n– The court identified procedural violations in the convening and conducting of the general meeting:
\n– Inconsistency of powers of the person who convened the meeting
\n– Improper notification of the cooperative member about the meeting
\n– Potential violations in making decisions regarding statute amendments and membership<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: The appellate court ruling was canceled, and the case was referred for a new review to the appellate commercial court for additional investigation of circumstances.<\/p>\n

Note: The court drew attention to the need for a detailed examination of all case circumstances, particularly regarding notification of cooperative members and grounds for member exclusion.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of Decisions of the General Meeting of the Service Cooperative “Tian Kong” and Related Registration Records. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: – The court identified procedural violations in the convening and conducting of the general meeting: – Inconsistency of powers of the person who convened…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5990","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5990","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5990"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5990\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5990"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5990"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5990"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}