{"id":5787,"date":"2025-02-24T09:27:16","date_gmt":"2025-02-24T07:27:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-201-1636-22-dated-06-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-24T09:27:16","modified_gmt":"2025-02-24T07:27:16","slug":"case-no-201-1636-22-dated-06-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-201-1636-22-dated-06-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 201\/1636\/22 dated 06\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Cassation Appeal of a Verdict Regarding a Person Accused of Illegal Drug Trafficking.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the appellate court approached the case formally, without properly verifying the defense&#8217;s arguments about possible procedural violations, particularly regarding evidence collection and potential pressure on the accused. The court emphasized the need for a thorough examination of all case circumstances, especially claims about violations of the accused&#8217;s rights and possible use of illegal methods of influence.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: Annul the appellate court&#8217;s verdict and assign a new review in the appellate court with a detailed verification of all case circumstances.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125265279\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Cassation Appeal of a Verdict Regarding a Person Accused of Illegal Drug Trafficking. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the appellate court approached the case formally, without properly verifying the defense&#8217;s arguments about possible procedural violations, particularly regarding evidence collection and potential pressure on the accused. The court&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5787","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5787","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5787"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5787\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5787"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5787"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5787"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}