{"id":5781,"date":"2025-02-24T09:24:52","date_gmt":"2025-02-24T07:24:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-339-530-23-dated-19-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-24T09:24:52","modified_gmt":"2025-02-24T07:24:52","slug":"case-no-339-530-23-dated-19-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-339-530-23-dated-19-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 339\/530\/23 dated 19\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Reinstatement of an elementary school teacher who was dismissed after the expiration of a fixed-term employment contract.<\/p>\n

2. Main Arguments of the Court:
\n– By the Constitutional Court’s decision, the paragraph on fixed-term contracts for teachers of retirement age was declared unconstitutional
\n– After this decision, the employer was obliged to transfer the employee to an indefinite-term contract
\n– Dismissal of the employee in connection with the contract expiration is illegal
\n– The employee appealed to the administration requesting an indefinite-term contract, but was not heard<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Reinstate PERSON_1 in the position of elementary school teacher and compel the conclusion of an indefinite-term employment contract.<\/p>\n

Note: The court deviated from previous judicial practice regarding fixed-term employment contracts for teachers of retirement age.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Reinstatement of an elementary school teacher who was dismissed after the expiration of a fixed-term employment contract. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: – By the Constitutional Court’s decision, the paragraph on fixed-term contracts for teachers of retirement age was declared unconstitutional – After this decision, the…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5781","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5781","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5781"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5781\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5781"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5781"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5781"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}