{"id":5779,"date":"2025-02-24T09:22:13","date_gmt":"2025-02-24T07:22:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-903-62-23-dated-20-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-24T09:22:13","modified_gmt":"2025-02-24T07:22:13","slug":"case-no-903-62-23-dated-20-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-903-62-23-dated-20-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 903\/62\/23 dated 20\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Actions of a Private Executor Regarding the Seizure of Property of JSC &#8220;Volyn Gas&#8221; in Enforcement Proceedings.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<\/p>\n<p>1. The private executor did not have the right to open enforcement proceedings and perform enforcement actions, as the state&#8217;s share in the authorized capital of JSC &#8220;Volyn Gas&#8221; exceeds 25% and is under the management of the National Agency for Identification, Search and Management of Assets.<\/p>\n<p>2. The court referred to a previous resolution dated 19.12.2024, which states that during asset management, the owner&#8217;s powers are exercised by the National Agency, and the property is actually in its ownership.<\/p>\n<p>3. This does not prevent the compulsory enforcement of a court decision by the State Enforcement Service, but prohibits the private executor from performing enforcement actions.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The complaint of JSC &#8220;Volyn Gas&#8221; has been satisfied, the actions of the private executor have been declared unlawful, and the resolution on property seizure has been canceled.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125291900\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Actions of a Private Executor Regarding the Seizure of Property of JSC &#8220;Volyn Gas&#8221; in Enforcement Proceedings. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. The private executor did not have the right to open enforcement proceedings and perform enforcement actions, as the state&#8217;s share in the authorized capital of JSC &#8220;Volyn&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5779","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5779","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5779"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5779\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5779"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5779"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5779"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}