{"id":5765,"date":"2025-02-24T09:14:22","date_gmt":"2025-02-24T07:14:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-910-5857-22-dated-18-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-24T09:14:22","modified_gmt":"2025-02-24T07:14:22","slug":"case-no-910-5857-22-dated-18-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-910-5857-22-dated-18-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 910\/5857\/22 dated 18\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of the Kyiv Regional Council&#8217;s Decision on Assigning Hunting Grounds to LLC &#8220;Zeleny Hay Farm&#8221; and Related Agreements.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<\/p>\n<p>1. The Supreme Court pointed out the necessity of clearly establishing the boundaries of hunting grounds and obtaining approvals from all landowners whose land parcels are included in these grounds.<\/p>\n<p>2. Courts of previous instances improperly examined evidence and did not establish whether all necessary approvals from landowners were actually obtained.<\/p>\n<p>3. The prosecutor legitimately filed a lawsuit as an independent plaintiff, since the State Forestry Agency was defined as the defendant in the case.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: Revoke the decisions of courts of previous instances and refer the case for a new hearing to the court of first instance for a comprehensive and thorough investigation of the case circumstances.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125291862\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of the Kyiv Regional Council&#8217;s Decision on Assigning Hunting Grounds to LLC &#8220;Zeleny Hay Farm&#8221; and Related Agreements. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. The Supreme Court pointed out the necessity of clearly establishing the boundaries of hunting grounds and obtaining approvals from all landowners whose land parcels are included in&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5765","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5765","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5765"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5765\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5765"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5765"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5765"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}