{"id":5731,"date":"2025-02-23T09:21:11","date_gmt":"2025-02-23T07:21:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-920-715-23-dated-13-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-23T09:21:11","modified_gmt":"2025-02-23T07:21:11","slug":"case-no-920-715-23-dated-13-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-920-715-23-dated-13-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 920\/715\/23 dated 13\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Illegality of the Village Council&#8217;s Decision on Land Plot Lease Transfer and Claiming these Land Plots from the New Lessee.<\/p>\n<p>Main Court Arguments:<br \/>\n1. The land share lease agreement dated 13.10.2015 is valid until 19.02.2028 and is properly registered.<br \/>\n2. Change in the land plot status does not terminate the original lease agreement.<br \/>\n3. Synivka Village Council did not have the right to lease land plots already leased by STOV &#8220;Khliborob&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Note: The court deviated from previous practice regarding the impossibility of land plot recovery by a lessee.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: Satisfy the claim of STOV &#8220;Khliborob&#8221; regarding the recovery of land plots from TOV &#8220;FG &#8220;Obriy&#8221;, but reject the request to declare the village council&#8217;s decision illegal.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125264712\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Illegality of the Village Council&#8217;s Decision on Land Plot Lease Transfer and Claiming these Land Plots from the New Lessee. Main Court Arguments: 1. The land share lease agreement dated 13.10.2015 is valid until 19.02.2028 and is properly registered. 2. Change in the land plot status does not terminate the&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5731","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5731","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5731"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5731\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5731"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5731"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5731"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}