{"id":5721,"date":"2025-02-23T09:15:05","date_gmt":"2025-02-23T07:15:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-910-19615-23-dated-04-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-23T09:15:05","modified_gmt":"2025-02-23T07:15:05","slug":"case-no-910-19615-23-dated-04-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-910-19615-23-dated-04-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 910\/19615\/23 dated 04\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Claiming a land plot with an area of 2.2606 hectares with cadastral number 6820681500:05:005:0021 from state ownership in favor of the Vinkivtsi Settlement Council.<\/p>\n

2. Main Arguments of the Court:
\n The Supreme Court indicated that the regional council’s decision from 04.04.2001 on granting a land plot to a forestry enterprise is valid and subject to execution. The absence of a state act for land use does not mean the absence of such a right. Planned cartographic forest management materials may confirm the right of permanent land use until 2027.<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Previous court decisions were canceled and the case was referred for a new review to the court of first instance for additional examination of the case circumstances.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Claiming a land plot with an area of 2.2606 hectares with cadastral number 6820681500:05:005:0021 from state ownership in favor of the Vinkivtsi Settlement Council. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court indicated that the regional council’s decision from 04.04.2001 on granting a land plot to…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5721","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5721","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5721"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5721\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5721"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5721"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5721"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}