{"id":5719,"date":"2025-02-23T09:14:00","date_gmt":"2025-02-23T07:14:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-757-18879-20-c-dated-12-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-23T09:14:00","modified_gmt":"2025-02-23T07:14:00","slug":"case-no-757-18879-20-c-dated-12-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-757-18879-20-c-dated-12-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 757\/18879\/20-c dated 12\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of the apartment purchase and sale agreement and recovery of property in favor of the Kyiv City territorial community as unclaimed inheritance.<\/p>\n

2. Main Arguments of the Court:
\n– After the death of the owner PERSON_7, no inheritance case was initiated, and no heirs were identified
\n– The donation agreement, on the basis of which subsequent property transfers occurred, is forged
\n– PERSON_1 cannot be considered a bona fide acquirer, as they are connected with a person suspected of criminal offenses related to illegal property seizure<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision:
\n– Denied invalidation of the purchase and sale agreement
\n– Recognized the inheritance as unclaimed and recovered the apartment in favor of the territorial community<\/p>\n

Note: The court deviated from the previous practice of the Supreme Court regarding methods of protecting the territorial community’s interests in inheritance cases.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of the apartment purchase and sale agreement and recovery of property in favor of the Kyiv City territorial community as unclaimed inheritance. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: – After the death of the owner PERSON_7, no inheritance case was initiated, and no heirs were identified…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5719","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5719","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5719"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5719\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5719"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}