{"id":5705,"date":"2025-02-23T09:07:48","date_gmt":"2025-02-23T07:07:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-185-10873-23-dated-13-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-23T09:07:48","modified_gmt":"2025-02-23T07:07:48","slug":"case-no-185-10873-23-dated-13-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-185-10873-23-dated-13-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 185\/10873\/23 dated 13\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Recovery of Material and Moral Damages from the Regional Branch &#8220;Donetsk Railway&#8221; as a Result of a Traffic Accident.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the regional branch &#8220;Donetsk Railway&#8221; cannot be a defendant in the case, as branches are not legal entities and do not have civil procedural capacity. The court violated procedural norms, as the proper defendant &#8211; JSC &#8220;Ukrainian Railways&#8221; &#8211; was not involved in the case, and the regional branch was not properly notified of the court hearing.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: To cancel the decisions of previous instances in the part of the civil claim and assign a new review of the case in the order of civil proceedings.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125228358\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Recovery of Material and Moral Damages from the Regional Branch &#8220;Donetsk Railway&#8221; as a Result of a Traffic Accident. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the regional branch &#8220;Donetsk Railway&#8221; cannot be a defendant in the case, as branches are not legal entities and do not have civil&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5705","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5705","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5705"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5705\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5705"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5705"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5705"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}