Here is the translation:<\/p>\n
1. Subject of Dispute: Application for Securing a Claim Prior to Filing a Claim Regarding Division of Marital Property, Specifically an Apartment, Automobile, and Property of Joint Entrepreneurial Activity.<\/p>\n
2. Main Arguments of the Court:
\n– The Pechersk District Court did not have the right to consider the application for securing a claim, as according to the rules of territorial jurisdiction, the case must be considered by the Solomiansk District Court at the location of the immovable property.
\n– The court violated procedural norms by considering the application not according to the legally established jurisdiction.
\n– The Appellate Court groundlessly did not pay attention to the violation of jurisdiction rules.<\/p>\n
3. Court Decision: Rescind previous court decisions and refuse to satisfy the application for securing a claim prior to filing a claim.<\/p>\n
Note: The Supreme Court deviated from previous practice of considering such cases, clearly emphasizing the principle of territorial jurisdiction.<\/p>\n