{"id":5629,"date":"2025-02-21T09:36:19","date_gmt":"2025-02-21T07:36:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-910-10742-21-dated-29-01-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-21T09:36:19","modified_gmt":"2025-02-21T07:36:19","slug":"case-no-910-10742-21-dated-29-01-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-910-10742-21-dated-29-01-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 910\/10742\/21 dated 29\/01\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Determination of the order and amount of creditor claims of LLC “FC “Paradise Finance” in the case of an individual’s insolvency.<\/p>\n

2. Main Arguments of the Court:
\n– The Court of Appeal improperly changed the order of creditor claims by “correcting a clerical error”, which essentially amounts to changing the substance of the court decision.
\n– The change of claim priority from extraordinary to second-tier occurred without proper legal grounds and violates the principles of judicial fairness.
\n– Correction of clerical errors cannot affect the content of the court decision and should only relate to technical mistakes.<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Revoke the resolution of the appellate court and refer the case for a new hearing.<\/p>\n

: The Supreme Court clearly indicated the inadmissibility of changing a court decision under the guise of correcting a clerical error.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: Determination of the order and amount of creditor claims of LLC “FC “Paradise Finance” in the case of an individual’s insolvency. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: – The Court of Appeal improperly changed the order of creditor claims by “correcting a clerical error”, which essentially amounts…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5629","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5629"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5629\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5629"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}