{"id":5567,"date":"2025-02-20T09:45:16","date_gmt":"2025-02-20T07:45:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-620-111-24-dated-13-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-20T09:45:16","modified_gmt":"2025-02-20T07:45:16","slug":"case-no-620-111-24-dated-13-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-620-111-24-dated-13-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 620\/111\/24 dated 13\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: The prosecutor attempted to challenge the inaction of a municipal enterprise regarding improper maintenance of a civil protection shelter.<\/p>\n

2. Main Arguments of the Court:
\n– The State Emergency Service (DSNS) and local district state administration do not have direct legislative right to independently file such lawsuits
\n– The prosecutor can represent state interests only in exceptional cases where authorized bodies cannot protect their interests
\n– The Civil Protection Code of Ukraine does not provide direct powers to DSNS and district state administrations to challenge the condition of protective structures<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Return the prosecutor’s statement of claim due to the absence of grounds for representing state interests.<\/p>\n

Note: The court essentially deviated from previous judicial practice, which allowed a broader interpretation of the prosecutor’s powers in such cases.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation: 1. Subject of Dispute: The prosecutor attempted to challenge the inaction of a municipal enterprise regarding improper maintenance of a civil protection shelter. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: – The State Emergency Service (DSNS) and local district state administration do not have direct legislative right to independently file such lawsuits…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5567","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5567","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5567"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5567\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5567"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5567"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5567"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}