{"id":5561,"date":"2025-02-20T09:43:18","date_gmt":"2025-02-20T07:43:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-925-457-23-dated-05-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-20T09:43:18","modified_gmt":"2025-02-20T07:43:18","slug":"case-no-925-457-23-dated-05-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-925-457-23-dated-05-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 925\/457\/23 dated 05\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation of the legal text summary:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of rent debt and termination of land lease agreement between Chyhyryn City Council and LLC &#8220;Prodagroinvest&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Court Arguments:<br \/>\n&#8211; Additional agreement to the land lease contract, signed before 01.01.2013, requires state registration<br \/>\n&#8211; Without registration of the additional agreement, the rental rate remains 3%, not 4.5%<br \/>\n&#8211; The company partially paid the rent, underpaying only 32,769.50 UAH of indexation<br \/>\n&#8211; Breach of contract is not substantial enough for its termination<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Partially satisfy the claim, recovering 32,769.50 UAH of debt from LLC &#8220;Prodagroinvest&#8221;, and refuse to terminate the contract.<\/p>\n<p>Note: The court deviated from previous practice regarding the mandatory state registration of additional agreements to land lease contracts.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125162571\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation of the legal text summary: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of rent debt and termination of land lease agreement between Chyhyryn City Council and LLC &#8220;Prodagroinvest&#8221;. 2. Main Court Arguments: &#8211; Additional agreement to the land lease contract, signed before 01.01.2013, requires state registration &#8211; Without registration of the additional agreement,&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5561","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5561","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5561"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5561\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5561"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}