{"id":5448,"date":"2025-02-17T09:12:40","date_gmt":"2025-02-17T07:12:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-380-26337-23-dated-12-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-17T09:12:40","modified_gmt":"2025-02-17T07:12:40","slug":"case-no-380-26337-23-dated-12-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-380-26337-23-dated-12-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 380\/26337\/23 dated 12\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Recalculation of Pension for a Participant in the Liquidation of the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident with Accrual of an Additional Percentage for Overtime Service.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that for persons whose pensions were assigned before October 2017, the right to a preferential procedure for calculating pension for overtime service is maintained without additional conditions. The court referred to the constitutional principle of non-retroactivity of laws and the inadmissibility of narrowing previously acquired social rights of citizens affected by the Chornobyl disaster.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: To satisfy the claim of PERSON_1, recognize the Pension Fund&#8217;s refusal to recalculate the pension as unlawful, and oblige the recalculation according to the rules in effect until October 2017.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125146115\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Recalculation of Pension for a Participant in the Liquidation of the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident with Accrual of an Additional Percentage for Overtime Service. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that for persons whose pensions were assigned before October 2017, the right to a preferential procedure for calculating&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5448","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5448","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5448"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5448\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5448"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5448"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5448"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}