{"id":5442,"date":"2025-02-17T09:09:38","date_gmt":"2025-02-17T07:09:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-5015-2060-11-dated-12-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-17T09:09:38","modified_gmt":"2025-02-17T07:09:38","slug":"case-no-5015-2060-11-dated-12-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-5015-2060-11-dated-12-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 5015\/2060\/11 dated 12\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation of the legal analysis:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the actions of a private executor regarding the determination of the debt amount in US dollars during the enforcement of a 2011 court decision.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; The 2011 court decision determined the debt amount in hryvnias with an equivalent in US dollars, which provides an additional guarantee for the creditor.<br \/>\n&#8211; The executor correctly indicated the total debt amount in dollars, as the loan was issued in foreign currency.<br \/>\n&#8211; The entrepreneur is essentially evading the execution of a court decision that has been legally valid since 2011.<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision: Partially satisfy the cassation complaint and refer the case for a new review to the appellate court to verify the statement of withdrawal of the complaint.<\/p>\n<p>Note: The court referred to a new legal position of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court regarding the determination of monetary obligations in foreign currency.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125139152\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation of the legal analysis: 1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the actions of a private executor regarding the determination of the debt amount in US dollars during the enforcement of a 2011 court decision. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: &#8211; The 2011 court decision determined the debt amount in hryvnias with&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5442","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5442","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5442"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5442\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5442"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5442"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5442"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}