{"id":5420,"date":"2025-02-16T09:26:10","date_gmt":"2025-02-16T07:26:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-320-11200-22-dated-12-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-16T09:26:10","modified_gmt":"2025-02-16T07:26:10","slug":"case-no-320-11200-22-dated-12-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-320-11200-22-dated-12-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 320\/11200\/22 dated 12\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Determination of the Monthly Pension Increase for a Non-Working Pensioner Residing in a Radioactively Contaminated Area as a Result of the Chornobyl Catastrophe.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court was guided by the conclusions of the Grand Chamber, which established that after the Constitutional Court&#8217;s decision of 17.07.2018 No. 6-r\/2018, the amount of pension increase should be determined not by the minimum wage, but by the subsistence minimum for able-bodied persons, established on January 1 of the respective calendar year. The Court took into account that Law No. 1774-VIII changed the calculation value from the minimum wage to the subsistence minimum for all payments.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of previous instances, confirming that the pensioner is entitled to a monthly pension increase of two subsistence minimums for able-bodied persons.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125113193\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Determination of the Monthly Pension Increase for a Non-Working Pensioner Residing in a Radioactively Contaminated Area as a Result of the Chornobyl Catastrophe. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court was guided by the conclusions of the Grand Chamber, which established that after the Constitutional Court&#8217;s decision of 17.07.2018 No. 6-r\/2018,&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5420","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5420","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5420"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5420\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5420"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5420"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5420"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}