{"id":5418,"date":"2025-02-16T09:25:04","date_gmt":"2025-02-16T07:25:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-240-18400-23-dated-12-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-16T09:25:04","modified_gmt":"2025-02-16T07:25:04","slug":"case-no-240-18400-23-dated-12-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-240-18400-23-dated-12-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 240\/18400\/23 dated 12\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>Subject of Dispute: The prosecutor filed a lawsuit demanding that the municipal enterprise bring the protective structure into a state of readiness.<\/p>\n<p>Key Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n1. The prosecutor can represent the interests of the state in court only in two cases: when the authority does not exercise protection or such authority is absent.<br \/>\n2. The Supreme Court established that legislation does not grant the State Emergency Service (DSNS) powers to independently file lawsuits about bringing protective structures into proper condition.<br \/>\n3. Legislative changes in 2022 did not create a clear mechanism for judicial protection of protective structures by the State Emergency Service.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: To leave the cassation appeal unsatisfied, that is, to support previous court decisions on leaving the lawsuit without consideration.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125113154\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: Subject of Dispute: The prosecutor filed a lawsuit demanding that the municipal enterprise bring the protective structure into a state of readiness. Key Arguments of the Court: 1. The prosecutor can represent the interests of the state in court only in two cases: when the authority does not exercise protection or&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5418"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5418\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}