{"id":5408,"date":"2025-02-16T09:18:35","date_gmt":"2025-02-16T07:18:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-916-683-22-dated-29-01-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-16T09:18:35","modified_gmt":"2025-02-16T07:18:35","slug":"case-no-916-683-22-dated-29-01-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-916-683-22-dated-29-01-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 916\/683\/22 dated 29\/01\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Subject of Dispute: The Prosecutor challenges the transfer of state-owned land plots to the communal ownership of the Kuyalnytsia Village Council.<\/p>\n

Main Arguments of the Court:<\/p>\n

1. The Prosecutor’s demands to declare the orders and acts of land plot transfer illegal are an ineffective method of protecting state property.<\/p>\n

2. The only appropriate method of protecting state rights is a vindicatory claim for the recovery of land plots, which the Prosecutor did not file.<\/p>\n

3. The Prosecutor cannot represent the interests of the state enterprise SE “Novoselivske”, as this contradicts the legislation on the prosecutor’s office.<\/p>\n

Court Decision: To leave the court decisions of previous instances unchanged, modifying only the reasoning part of the decision.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Subject of Dispute: The Prosecutor challenges the transfer of state-owned land plots to the communal ownership of the Kuyalnytsia Village Council. Main Arguments of the Court: 1. The Prosecutor’s demands to declare the orders and acts of land plot transfer illegal are an ineffective method of protecting state property. 2. The only appropriate method of…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5408","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5408","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5408"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5408\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5408"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5408"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5408"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}