{"id":5374,"date":"2025-02-15T09:39:18","date_gmt":"2025-02-15T07:39:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-520-34488-23-dated-11-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-15T09:39:18","modified_gmt":"2025-02-15T07:39:18","slug":"case-no-520-34488-23-dated-11-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-520-34488-23-dated-11-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 520\/34488\/23 dated 11\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the dispute &#8211; the legality of the Main Pension Fund of Ukraine&#8217;s refusal to grant a service pension to an individual.<\/p>\n<p>The court was guided by the following key arguments: firstly, the person applied for pension assignment after 19.02.2022, when changes to the pension calculation procedure came into effect; secondly, from this moment, pension assignment is carried out exclusively taking into account the calendar service years; thirdly, the plaintiff lacks the calendar service years (23 years instead of the required 25 years) for pension assignment.<\/p>\n<p>The court deviated from previous practice and clearly defined that for persons who applied for a pension after 19.02.2022, only calendar service years are taken into account.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court decided to leave the cassation appeal unsatisfied and support the previous decision of the appellate court on the refusal to grant a pension.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125082054\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the dispute &#8211; the legality of the Main Pension Fund of Ukraine&#8217;s refusal to grant a service pension to an individual. The court was guided by the following key arguments: firstly, the person applied for pension assignment after 19.02.2022, when changes to the pension calculation procedure came into effect; secondly, from this moment,&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5374","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5374","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5374"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5374\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5374"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5374"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5374"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}