{"id":5356,"date":"2025-02-15T09:31:11","date_gmt":"2025-02-15T07:31:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-240-1123-24-dated-11-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-15T09:31:11","modified_gmt":"2025-02-15T07:31:11","slug":"case-no-240-1123-24-dated-11-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-240-1123-24-dated-11-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 240\/1123\/24 dated 11\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Recognition of the Pension Fund&#8217;s Refusal to Recalculate Pension for a Person Affected by the Chornobyl Disaster as Unlawful, and Obligation to Perform Pension Recalculation in Accordance with the Previous Version of the Law.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the 2021 version of the law sets lower pension amounts for Chornobyl disaster victims than previously provided. The Court referred to the Constitutional Court&#8217;s decision, which emphasized that the state cannot reduce social guarantees for this category of persons, as this violates their constitutional rights and the principle of social protection.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The Supreme Court satisfied the claim, cancelled the decisions of previous instances, and obliged the Pension Fund to calculate and pay the plaintiff&#8217;s pension in the amount of 6 minimum old-age pensions in accordance with the previous version of the law.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125082065\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the Dispute: Recognition of the Pension Fund&#8217;s Refusal to Recalculate Pension for a Person Affected by the Chornobyl Disaster as Unlawful, and Obligation to Perform Pension Recalculation in Accordance with the Previous Version of the Law. Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the 2021 version of the law sets&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5356","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5356","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5356"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5356\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5356"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5356"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5356"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}