{"id":5354,"date":"2025-02-15T09:30:04","date_gmt":"2025-02-15T07:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-908-2157-21-dated-21-01-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-15T09:30:04","modified_gmt":"2025-02-15T07:30:04","slug":"case-no-908-2157-21-dated-21-01-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-908-2157-21-dated-21-01-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 908\/2157\/21 dated 21\/01\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Imposing Joint and Several Liability on the Director of LLC &#8220;Telecommunication and Information Systems&#8221; for Untimely Bankruptcy Petition.<\/p>\n<p>Main Arguments of the Court:<\/p>\n<p>The court established that to impose joint and several liability on the debtor&#8217;s director, it is necessary to clearly determine the amount of such liability and claim recovery of a specific sum. In this case, the creditor did not specify the amount of damages, therefore the claim is premature. Joint and several liability has a tort nature and is aimed at compensating for damages caused to the debtor and its creditors due to untimely filing of a bankruptcy petition.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: The Supreme Court completely cancelled previous court decisions and denied the creditor&#8217;s application for imposing joint and several liability on the director.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125061168\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Imposing Joint and Several Liability on the Director of LLC &#8220;Telecommunication and Information Systems&#8221; for Untimely Bankruptcy Petition. Main Arguments of the Court: The court established that to impose joint and several liability on the debtor&#8217;s director, it is necessary to clearly determine the amount of such liability and claim recovery of&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5354","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5354","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5354"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5354\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5354"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}