{"id":5352,"date":"2025-02-15T09:27:59","date_gmt":"2025-02-15T07:27:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-905-221-23-905-917-23-dated-04-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-15T09:27:59","modified_gmt":"2025-02-15T07:27:59","slug":"case-no-905-221-23-905-917-23-dated-04-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-905-221-23-905-917-23-dated-04-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 905\/221\/23 (905\/917\/23) dated 04\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Recovery from PrivatBank of 1,400,000 UAH in lease payments made under a financial leasing agreement that was terminated.<\/p>\n<p>Key Court Arguments:<br \/>\n1. The financial leasing agreement is a mixed contract and includes elements of lease and sale.<br \/>\n2. Part of the lease payments is essentially a prepayment for property that was to be transferred to ownership.<br \/>\n3. After contract termination, the lessor loses the obligation to transfer property ownership, therefore the lessee has the right to demand return of paid funds.<\/p>\n<p>Court Decision: Satisfy the claim and recover from PrivatBank in favor of LLC &#8220;Klaipeda Group&#8221; 1,400,000 UAH of paid lease payments.<\/p>\n<p>Note: The court deviated from previous judicial practice, clearly explaining the mechanism of fund recovery upon termination of a financial leasing agreement.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125061160\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Recovery from PrivatBank of 1,400,000 UAH in lease payments made under a financial leasing agreement that was terminated. Key Court Arguments: 1. The financial leasing agreement is a mixed contract and includes elements of lease and sale. 2. Part of the lease payments is essentially a prepayment for property that was to&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5352","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5352","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5352"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5352\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5352"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5352"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5352"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}