{"id":5306,"date":"2025-02-14T09:32:31","date_gmt":"2025-02-14T07:32:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-922-3929-23-dated-23-01-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-14T09:32:31","modified_gmt":"2025-02-14T07:32:31","slug":"case-no-922-3929-23-dated-23-01-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-922-3929-23-dated-23-01-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 922\/3929\/23 dated 23\/01\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation of the legal text summary:<\/p>\n

1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of debt for completed construction and installation works and accrual of 3% per annum and inflationary losses.<\/p>\n

2. Main Court Arguments:
\n– Plaintiff fully completed works for the amount of 17,447,636.11 UAH
\n– Defendant partially paid 12,276,410.67 UAH
\n– Contract terms stipulate that payment depends on tax invoice registration
\n– Court recognized the legitimacy of recovering the principal debt of 5,171,225.45 UAH
\n– Court rejected the claim for 3% per annum and inflationary losses because the plaintiff did not comply with contract terms regarding tax invoice registration<\/p>\n

3. Court Decision: Partial satisfaction of the claim – recovery of principal debt of 5,171,225.45 UAH, but rejection of penalty sanctions.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here is the translation of the legal text summary: 1. Subject of Dispute: Recovery of debt for completed construction and installation works and accrual of 3% per annum and inflationary losses. 2. Main Court Arguments: – Plaintiff fully completed works for the amount of 17,447,636.11 UAH – Defendant partially paid 12,276,410.67 UAH – Contract terms…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5306","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5306","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5306"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5306\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5306"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5306"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5306"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}