{"id":5256,"date":"2025-02-13T09:40:25","date_gmt":"2025-02-13T07:40:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-910-31-24-dated-04-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-13T09:40:25","modified_gmt":"2025-02-13T07:40:25","slug":"case-no-910-31-24-dated-04-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-910-31-24-dated-04-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 910\/31\/24 dated 04\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation:<\/p>\n<p>Brief Analysis of the Court Decision:<\/p>\n<p>1. Subject of Dispute: Dispute regarding the legitimacy of charging a fee for electricity transmission during its export.<\/p>\n<p>2. Main Arguments of the Court:<br \/>\n&#8211; The court noted that the disputed legal relations arose after amendments to the Transmission System Code, which provided for the mandatory payment of transmission tariff by exporters.<br \/>\n&#8211; Previous courts did not thoroughly investigate:<br \/>\n   * the nature and content of the disputed legal relations<br \/>\n   * contract conditions<br \/>\n   * compliance of charges with legislative requirements<br \/>\n   * legal grounds for funds reimbursement<\/p>\n<p>3. Court Decision:<br \/>\nThe Supreme Court cancelled previous court decisions and referred the case for a new hearing to thoroughly examine all circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>Key Thesis: The court pointed to the need for a careful analysis of the legal grounds for charging transmission fees for electricity export.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/125000628\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the translation: Brief Analysis of the Court Decision: 1. Subject of Dispute: Dispute regarding the legitimacy of charging a fee for electricity transmission during its export. 2. Main Arguments of the Court: &#8211; The court noted that the disputed legal relations arose after amendments to the Transmission System Code, which provided for the&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5256","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5256","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5256"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5256\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5256"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5256"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5256"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}