{"id":5254,"date":"2025-02-13T09:39:51","date_gmt":"2025-02-13T07:39:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/02\/case-no-354-609-15-c-dated-05-02-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-02-13T09:39:51","modified_gmt":"2025-02-13T07:39:51","slug":"case-no-354-609-15-c-dated-05-02-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/02\/case-no-354-609-15-c-dated-05-02-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 354\/609\/15-c dated 05\/02\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Subject of the Dispute: The Prosecutor Attempts to Invalidate the State Certificate for a Forest Fund Land Plot and Reclaim It for State Ownership.<\/p>\n

Main Court Arguments:
\n1. The Court established that the land plot was illegally withdrawn from state ownership as a result of criminal actions by local council officials in 2003.<\/p>\n

2. The Court deviated from previous practice and indicated that invalidating the state certificate is not an effective method of protecting state property rights.<\/p>\n

3. The only appropriate method of protection is a vindicatory claim – demanding the land plot from the last acquirer (LLC “Skorzonera”) through commercial court proceedings.<\/p>\n

Court Decision: Reject the prosecutor’s claim and terminate the proceedings regarding the claims against LLC “Skorzonera” due to improper jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Subject of the Dispute: The Prosecutor Attempts to Invalidate the State Certificate for a Forest Fund Land Plot and Reclaim It for State Ownership. Main Court Arguments: 1. The Court established that the land plot was illegally withdrawn from state ownership as a result of criminal actions by local council officials in 2003. 2. The…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5254"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5254\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}