{"id":3379,"date":"2024-12-22T09:15:12","date_gmt":"2024-12-22T07:15:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2024\/12\/case-no-333-4863-23-dated-11-12-2024\/"},"modified":"2024-12-22T09:15:12","modified_gmt":"2024-12-22T07:15:12","slug":"case-no-333-4863-23-dated-11-12-2024","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2024\/12\/case-no-333-4863-23-dated-11-12-2024\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 333\/4863\/23 dated 11\/12\/2024"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the dispute &#8211; challenging a court verdict regarding the conviction of a person for theft of chocolate and headphones with a total value of less than 2,000 hryvnias during martial law. When making the decision, the court was guided by the fact that after the Law No. 3886-IX of 18.07.2024 came into force, the threshold between administrative and criminal liability for theft was changed &#8211; from 0.2 to 2 non-taxable minimum incomes of citizens (2,684.10 hryvnias in 2023). Since the value of the stolen items was less than this amount, and the new law has retroactive effect, the person&#8217;s act ceased to be criminally punishable and became an administrative offense.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court revoked the first instance court&#8217;s verdict and the appellate court&#8217;s ruling, closed the criminal proceedings due to decriminalization of the act, and ordered the release of the convicted person from custody.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/123841684\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of the dispute &#8211; challenging a court verdict regarding the conviction of a person for theft of chocolate and headphones with a total value of less than 2,000 hryvnias during martial law. When making the decision, the court was guided by the fact that after the Law No. 3886-IX of 18.07.2024 came into force,&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3379","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3379","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3379"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3379\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3379"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3379"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3379"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}