{"id":3203,"date":"2024-12-16T09:21:38","date_gmt":"2024-12-16T07:21:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2024\/12\/case-no-520-3473-2020-dated-11-12-2024\/"},"modified":"2024-12-16T09:21:38","modified_gmt":"2024-12-16T07:21:38","slug":"case-no-520-3473-2020-dated-11-12-2024","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2024\/12\/case-no-520-3473-2020-dated-11-12-2024\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 520\/3473\/2020 dated 11\/12\/2024"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Possibility of Appealing a Court Order Refusing to Satisfy a Motion for Enforcement of a Court Decision.<\/p>\n<p>The court was guided by the following arguments: 1) the right to appeal is a constitutional right that cannot be limited by law; 2) the impossibility of appealing an order refusing to satisfy a motion violates the principle of equality of parties, as the opposite party has the right to appeal; 3) the lack of ability to appeal such an order may lead to non-enforcement of a court decision.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court satisfied the cassation appeal, revoked the appellate court&#8217;s order, and remanded the case for a new hearing, recognizing the right to appeal an order refusing to satisfy a motion filed in accordance with Article 383 of the Administrative Procedure Code of Ukraine.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/123733870\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Subject of Dispute: Possibility of Appealing a Court Order Refusing to Satisfy a Motion for Enforcement of a Court Decision. The court was guided by the following arguments: 1) the right to appeal is a constitutional right that cannot be limited by law; 2) the impossibility of appealing an order refusing to satisfy a motion&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3203","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3203","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3203"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3203\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3203"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3203"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3203"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}