Ruling Regarding Refusal to Open Constitutional Proceedings on a Complaint Concerning the Constitutionality of Certain Provisions of the Code of Administrative Offenses on Automatic Recording of Transport Violations<\/p>\n
Structurally, the ruling consists of three main parts: 1) presentation of case circumstances and the complainant’s requirements; 2) the Constitutional Court’s legal position on the impossibility of submitting duplicate constitutional complaints; 3) motivational part on refusing to open proceedings.<\/p>\n
Key provisions of the ruling:<\/p>\n
\u2022 The complainant has already submitted an identical constitutional complaint previously, for which proceedings were opened<\/p>\n
\u2022 Duplicating constitutional complaints is not an appropriate method of exercising the right to file a constitutional complaint<\/p>\n
\u2022 An identical copy of the constitutional complaint is not a separate written petition within the meaning of the law on the Constitutional Court<\/p>\n
\u2022 Since proceedings have already been opened for the first complaint, there are no grounds for opening another proceeding<\/p>\n