{"id":2571,"date":"2024-12-01T09:26:52","date_gmt":"2024-12-01T07:26:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2024\/12\/case-no-460-2558-24-dated-26-11-2024\/"},"modified":"2024-12-01T09:26:52","modified_gmt":"2024-12-01T07:26:52","slug":"case-no-460-2558-24-dated-26-11-2024","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2024\/12\/case-no-460-2558-24-dated-26-11-2024\/","title":{"rendered":"Case No. 460\/2558\/24 dated 26\/11\/2024"},"content":{"rendered":"

The court was guided by the fact that Article 13 of the Law “On Pension Provision” provides not a separate type of pension, but only preferential conditions for age-based pension assignment by reducing the retirement age. Since the preferential age-based pension is assigned and paid according to the procedure and conditions of the Law “On Compulsory State Pension Insurance”, persons receiving such a pension are not entitled to re-assign the same type of pension (age-based pension) with the application of a new average wage indicator. In this case, the Supreme Court deviated from its previous legal positions in similar cases.<\/p>\n

Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The court was guided by the fact that Article 13 of the Law “On Pension Provision” provides not a separate type of pension, but only preferential conditions for age-based pension assignment by reducing the retirement age. Since the preferential age-based pension is assigned and paid according to the procedure and conditions of the Law “On…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2571","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice-ukraine","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2571","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2571"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2571\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2571"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2571"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2571"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}