{"id":2298,"date":"2024-11-22T10:11:08","date_gmt":"2024-11-22T08:11:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2024\/11\/case-of-yakobson-v-ukraine\/"},"modified":"2024-11-22T10:11:08","modified_gmt":"2024-11-22T08:11:08","slug":"case-of-yakobson-v-ukraine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2024\/11\/case-of-yakobson-v-ukraine\/","title":{"rendered":"CASE OF YAKOBSON v. UKRAINE"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The case concerns the annulment of property rights and eviction of a Ukrainian family from their house, which they had purchased at a public auction in 2003. The first applicant bought the house for 15,700 UAH at a State-administered auction, but the previous owner&#8217;s heir successfully challenged the sale&#8217;s legitimacy in 2012.The Court found violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) regarding the first applicant and Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) regarding all applicants. The key issues were:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The first applicant was deprived of property rights due to wrongful acts of others, despite being a good faith purchaser<\/li>\n<li>The compensation awarded (about one-fifth of the market value) was inadequate and partially unpaid<\/li>\n<li>The burden of correcting third parties&#8217; wrongs was unfairly placed on the applicant<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The Court&#8217;s main findings were:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The deprivation of property rights was disproportionate and placed an excessive burden on the first applicant<\/li>\n<li>The compensation mechanism didn&#8217;t account for inflation, market price changes, or other time-sensitive factors<\/li>\n<li>The eviction violated the right to respect for home of all family members<\/li>\n<li>The Court awarded \u20ac26,000 in total compensation to all applicants jointly<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/?i=001-238022\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The case concerns the annulment of property rights and eviction of a Ukrainian family from their house, which they had purchased at a public auction in 2003. The first applicant bought the house for 15,700 UAH at a State-administered auction, but the previous owner&#8217;s heir successfully challenged the sale&#8217;s legitimacy in 2012.The Court found violations&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[129,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2298","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-echr-decisions","category-eu-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2298","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2298"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2298\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2298"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2298"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2298"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}