Please provide the text or the list of legislative acts you wish me to analyze. You have not included the content in your message. Once provided, I will deliver a concise, professional summary of the core regulatory content for each act.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a>Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026\/2102 of 13\u00a0July 2026 amending Regulation (EU)\u00a02023\/1115 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of relevant commodities and relevant products<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nCommission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026\/2093 of 10\u00a0July 2026 supplementing Regulation (EU)\u00a0No\u00a01308\/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards national payments for the distillation of wine, green harvesting and grubbing up of productive vineyards in justified cases of crisis<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026\/2078 of 9\u00a0September 2026 on the registration of the geographical indication Olio dei Colli di Bologna (PGI) in the Union register of geographical indications pursuant to Regulation (EU)\u00a02024\/1143 of the European Parliament and of the Council<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026\/2046 of 14\u00a0September 2026 amending Implementing Regulation (EU)\u00a02022\/964 as regards administrative and minor changes to the Union authorisation for the biocidal product family SOPUROXID<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Absara Industrial, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 Opposition proceedings \u2013 Application for the EU word mark KROMAT \u2013 Earlier EU word mark CROMA \u2013 Technical issue during the production of evidence by one of the parties \u2013 Reopening of the proceedings \u2013 Audi alteram partem rule \u2013 Second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017\/1001 \u2013 Probative value of the evidence of genuine use of the earlier mark \u2013 Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017\/1001 \u2013 Relative ground for refusal \u2013 Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017\/1001.Case T-467\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Worldwide Machinery Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 Proceedings for the assignment of the EU trade mark \u2013 EU figurative mark SUPERIOR MANUFACTURING \u2013 Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207\/2009 \u2013 Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207\/2009 \u2013 Concept of \u2018agent or representative\u2019 \u2013 Rejection of the request for assignment \u2013 Obligation to state reasons \u2013 Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017\/1001.Case T-566\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.EB v European Central Bank.Civil service \u2013 ECB Staff \u2013 Short-term contract \u2013 Termination before appointment has been taken up \u2013 Breakdown in the relationship of trust \u2013 Notice period.Case T-287\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Fitmart Gmbh & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 International registration designating the European Union \u2013 Figurative mark ULTRAPURE \u2013 Absolute ground for refusal \u2013 No distinctive character \u2013 Article (7)(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017\/1001.Case T-890\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Roman Trotsenko v Council of the European Union.Common foreign and security policy \u2013 Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine \u2013 Freezing of funds \u2013 Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States \u2013 Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant\u2019s name on the lists \u2013 Concept of \u2018businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation\u2019 \u2013 Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014\/145\/CFSP \u2013 Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269\/2014 \u2013 Duty to state reasons \u2013 Rights of the defence \u2013 Plea of illegality \u2013 Error of assessment \u2013 Right to property \u2013 Proportionality.Case T-459\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 des produits Nestl\u00e9 SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 Invalidity proceedings \u2013 EU word mark FITNESS \u2013 Absolute grounds for invalidity \u2013 Descriptive character \u2013 Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40\/94 \u2013 Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal \u2013 Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207\/2009.Case T-509\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Sudex O\u00dc v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 Invalidity proceedings \u2013 EU figurative mark Remington SYNERGY WORLD \u2013 Absolute ground for invalidity \u2013 Bad faith \u2013 Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017\/1001.Case T-885\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Polina Sergeevna Gagarina v Council of the European Union.Common foreign and security policy \u2013 Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine \u2013 Freezing of funds \u2013 Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States \u2013 Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States \u2013 Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant\u2019s name on the lists \u2013 Concept of \u2018support of actions which undermine the territorial integrity of Ukraine\u2019 \u2013 Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014\/145\/CFSP \u2013 Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269\/2014 \u2013 Duty to state reasons \u2013 Error of assessment \u2013 Proportionality \u2013 Freedom of expression and freedom of the arts.Case T-460\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Cobra Golf Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 Application for the EU word mark ULTRADRY \u2013 Absolute grounds for refusal \u2013 Descriptive character \u2013 Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017\/1001 \u2013 No distinctive character \u2013 Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017\/1001.Case T-827\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2026.Fissore Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 Opposition proceedings \u2013 Application for the EU figurative mark Fissore \u2013 Earlier EU figurative mark CristianoFissore \u2013 Relative ground for refusal \u2013 Likelihood of confusion \u2013 Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017\/1001 \u2013 No peaceful coexistence between the marks at issue \u2013 No limitation in consequence of acquiescence \u2013 Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017\/1001.Case T-60\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n