Please provide the list of legal acts you would like me to review. As soon as you provide the text or references, I will proceed with the analysis according to your requirements.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a>Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026\/1214 of 9\u00a0June 2026 amending Regulation (EU)\u00a02024\/1257 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards conditions for testing compliance with brake particle emission limits<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nCommission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026\/1167 of 28\u00a0May 2026 supplementing Regulation (EU) No\u00a0575\/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying operational risk requirements<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026\/1166 of 28\u00a0May 2026 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the mapping of the business indicator components with corresponding supervisory reporting references<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 September 2026.Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU design \u2013 Invalidity proceedings \u2013 International registration designating the European Union \u2013 Design representing a footwear sole \u2013 Prior EU designs \u2013 Grounds for invalidity \u2013 Individual character \u2013 Different overall impression \u2013 Degree of attention of an informed user \u2013 Degree of freedom of the designer \u2013 Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6\/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024\/2822.Case T-376\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nArr\u00eat du Tribunal (deuxi\u00e8me chambre) du 2 septembre 2026.#Jaime Garc\u00eda \u00c1vila contre Office de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne pour la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle.#Marque de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne \u2013 Proc\u00e9dure de nullit\u00e9 \u2013 Marque de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne tridimensionnelle \u2013 Forme d\u2019une bouteille bleue comportant des \u00e9l\u00e9ments verbaux \u2013 Marque nationale figurative ant\u00e9rieure 1890 ESPECIAL EX\u00d3TICA GIN PREMIUM \u2013 Cause de nullit\u00e9 absolue \u2013 Absence de mauvaise foi \u2013 Article 59, paragraphe 1, sous b), du r\u00e8glement (UE) 2017\/1001 \u2013 Cause de nullit\u00e9 relative \u2013 Absence de risque de confusion \u2013 Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du r\u00e8glement 2017\/1001.#Affaire T-678\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.ES v European Commission.Civil service \u2013 Recruitment \u2013 Internal competition COM\/AD\/03\/22 (AD 5) \u2013 Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition \u2013 Principle of good administration \u2013 Duty of diligence and duty of care \u2013 Manifest error of assessment.Case T-416\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2026.Health Labs Care S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 Opposition proceedings \u2013 Application for EU figurative mark NPhealthLABS+ \u2013 Earlier national company name Health Labs \u2013 Relative ground for refusal \u2013 Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017\/1001 \u2013 Right to prohibit the use of a subsequent mark \u2013 Likelihood of confusion \u2013 Similarity of signs \u2013 Distinctiveness \u2013 Right to be heard \u2013 Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017\/1001 \u2013 Rejection of the opposition.Case T-635\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nUrteil des Gerichts (Zweite Kammer) vom 2. September 2026.#Olymp Bezner KG gegen Amt der Europ\u00e4ischen Union f\u00fcr geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke \u2013 Anmeldung einer Unionsbildmarke, die die Kombination der drei Farben Wei\u00df, Dunkelblau und Blau darstellt \u2013 Absolutes Eintragungshindernis \u2013 Fehlende Unterscheidungskraft \u2013 Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung (EU) 2017\/1001 \u2013 Begr\u00fcndungspflicht \u2013 Art. 94 der Verordnung 2017\/1001 \u2013 Gleichbehandlung.#Rechtssache T-835\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.Ferring Pharmaceuticals A\/S v European Commission.Medicinal products for human use \u2013 Generic medicinal products \u2013 Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Degarelix Accord \u2013 degarelix acetate \u2013 Lack of bioequivalence study with the reference medicinal product \u2013 Article 10(1) and (2) of Directive 2001\/83\/EC \u2013 Manifest error of assessment \u2013 Principle of good administration.Case T-12\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nArr\u00eat du Tribunal (premi\u00e8re chambre) du 2 septembre 2026.#Stratio Big Data Inc. contre Office de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne pour la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle.#Marque de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne \u2013 Proc\u00e9dure de d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance \u2013 Marque de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne verbale stratio \u2013 Incident technique lors de la production d\u2019\u00e9l\u00e9ments de preuve et de leurs traductions par l\u2019une des parties \u2013 Absence de transmission par l\u2019EUIPO de certaines traductions \u00e0 l\u2019autre partie \u2013 Droits de la d\u00e9fense \u2013 Principe du contradictoire \u2013 Article 94, paragraphe 1, deuxi\u00e8me phrase, du r\u00e8glement (UE) 2017\/1001.#Affaire T-49\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2026.Health Labs Care S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 Opposition proceedings \u2013 Application for EU figurative mark HealthLabs PHARM \u2013 Relative ground for refusal \u2013 Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017\/1001 \u2013 Right to prohibit the use of a subsequent trade mark \u2013 Earlier national company name Health Labs Care Sp\u00f3\u0142ka z ograniczon\u0105 odpowiedzialno\u015bci\u0105 Sp\u00f3\u0142ka komandytowa \u2013 Likelihood of confusion.Case T-681\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 September 2026.A&P Deco NV v Belgische Staat.Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Taxation \u2013 Common system of VAT \u2013 Articles 19 and 29 of Directive 2006\/112\/EC \u2013 Transfer of a totality of assets or part thereof \u2013 Concomitant and separate letting contract of an immovable property \u2013 Taking over a business \u2013 Letting of a building \u2013 Building let by the transferor to the transferee of a business and used by the transferee for the purpose of carrying out the taxable activity taken over \u2013 Right of deduction \u2013 Articles 184 to 190 of Directive 2006\/112 \u2013 Adjustment of the VAT deduction by the transferor.Case T-397\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 September 2026.F R v Finanzamt \u00d6sterreich.Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Taxation \u2013 Common system of VAT \u2013 Supply of goods for consideration \u2013 Article 2(1)(a) of Directive 2006\/112\/EC \u2013 Application of a business asset transferred free of charge or applied for purposes other than those of the business \u2013 Article 16 of Directive 2006\/112 \u2013 Transfer of a totality of assets or part thereof \u2013 Article 19 of Directive 2006\/112 \u2013 Contribution of developed properties \u2013 Option for the Member States to exclude the transfer of a totality of assets or part thereof from the scope of VAT \u2013 Direct effect.Case T-413\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.Warbud S.A. v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.Public works contracts \u2013 Tendering procedure \u2013 Design and construction of Frontex permanent premises \u2013 Rejection of a tenderer\u2019s tender \u2013 Action for annulment \u2013 Act open to challenge \u2013 Interest in bringing proceedings \u2013 Admissibility \u2013 Obligation to state reasons \u2013 Abnormally low tender.Case T-658\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nArr\u00eat du Tribunal (dixi\u00e8me chambre) du 2 septembre 2026.#Igor Albertovich Kesaev contre Conseil de l’Union europ\u00e9enne.#Politique \u00e9trang\u00e8re et de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 commune \u2013 Mesures restrictives prises eu \u00e9gard aux actions compromettant ou mena\u00e7ant l\u2019int\u00e9grit\u00e9 territoriale, la souverainet\u00e9 et l\u2019ind\u00e9pendance de l\u2019Ukraine \u2013 Gel des fonds \u2013 Liste des personnes, des entit\u00e9s et des organismes auxquels s\u2019applique le gel des fonds et des ressources \u00e9conomiques \u2013 Maintien du nom du requ\u00e9rant sur la liste \u2013 Notion de \u201cfemme ou homme d\u2019affaires ayant une activit\u00e9 dans des secteurs \u00e9conomiques qui fournissent une source substantielle de revenus au gouvernement de la F\u00e9d\u00e9ration de Russie\u201d \u2013 Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous g), de la d\u00e9cision 2014\/145\/PESC \u2013 Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous g), du r\u00e8glement (UE) no 269\/2014 \u2013 Exception d\u2019ill\u00e9galit\u00e9 \u2013 Erreur d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation \u2013 Proportionnalit\u00e9 \u2013 S\u00e9curit\u00e9 juridique \u2013 \u00c9galit\u00e9 de traitement.#Affaire T-296\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 September 2026.Opera Norway AS v European Commission.Digital services \u2013 Regulation (EU) 2022\/1925 \u2013 Designation of gatekeepers \u2013 Web browser \u2013 Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2022\/1925 \u2013 Important gateway for business users to reach end users \u2013 Presumption \u2013 Article 17(3) of Regulation 2022\/1925 \u2013 Market investigation for designating gatekeepers \u2013 Action for annulment \u2013 Individual concern \u2013 Admissibility \u2013 Duty to state reasons \u2013 Error of law \u2013 Error of assessment \u2013 Principle of good administration.Case T-357\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 September 2026.Global Legal Action Network and Climate Action Network Europe (CAN-Europe) v European Commission.Environment \u2013 Regulation (EU) 2018\/842 \u2013 Annual greenhouse gas emission reductions \u2013 Review of annual greenhouse gas emission allocations of the Member States for the period from 2023 to 2030 \u2013 Implementing Decision (EU) 2023\/1319 \u2013 Refusal of the request for internal review \u2013 Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367\/2006 \u2013 Aarhus Convention \u2013 Grounds for review of Regulations (EU) 2021\/1119 and (EU) 2023\/857 setting out the European Union\u2019s greenhouse gas emission reduction targets for 2030 \u2013 Implementing power of the Commission \u2013 Article 291(2) TFEU \u2013 Grounds for review directed against an impact assessment \u2013 Legislative proposal.Case T-120\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.\u00d6zkan Demir \u00c7elik Sanayi A\u015e v European Commission.Dumping \u2013 Imports of steel bulb flats originating in China and T\u00fcrkiye \u2013 Definitive anti-dumping duty \u2013 Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024\/209 \u2013 Article 2(10)(j) of Regulation (EU) 2016\/1036 \u2013 Currency conversions \u2013 Article 2(4), (10) and (11) of Regulation 2016\/1036 \u2013 Ordinary course of trade \u2013 Fair comparison between the export price and the normal value \u2013 Quarterly dumping margin calculation).Case T-175\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.ES v European Commission.Civil service \u2013 Recruitment \u2013 Internal competition COM\/AD\/03\/22 (AD 5) \u2013 Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition \u2013 Principle of good administration \u2013 Duty of diligence and duty of care \u2013 Manifest error of assessment.Case T-416\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 September 2026.Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU design \u2013 Invalidity proceedings \u2013 International registration designating the European Union \u2013 Design representing a footwear sole \u2013 Prior EU designs \u2013 Grounds for invalidity \u2013 Individual character \u2013 Different overall impression \u2013 Degree of attention of an informed user \u2013 Degree of freedom of the designer \u2013 Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6\/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024\/2822.Case T-376\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nArr\u00eat du Tribunal (deuxi\u00e8me chambre) du 2 septembre 2026.#Jaime Garc\u00eda \u00c1vila contre Office de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne pour la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle.#Marque de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne \u2013 Proc\u00e9dure de nullit\u00e9 \u2013 Marque de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne tridimensionnelle \u2013 Forme d\u2019une bouteille bleue comportant des \u00e9l\u00e9ments verbaux \u2013 Marque nationale figurative ant\u00e9rieure 1890 ESPECIAL EX\u00d3TICA GIN PREMIUM \u2013 Cause de nullit\u00e9 absolue \u2013 Absence de mauvaise foi \u2013 Article 59, paragraphe 1, sous b), du r\u00e8glement (UE) 2017\/1001 \u2013 Cause de nullit\u00e9 relative \u2013 Absence de risque de confusion \u2013 Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du r\u00e8glement 2017\/1001.#Affaire T-678\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2026.Health Labs Care S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 Opposition proceedings \u2013 Application for EU figurative mark NPhealthLABS+ \u2013 Earlier national company name Health Labs \u2013 Relative ground for refusal \u2013 Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017\/1001 \u2013 Right to prohibit the use of a subsequent mark \u2013 Likelihood of confusion \u2013 Similarity of signs \u2013 Distinctiveness \u2013 Right to be heard \u2013 Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017\/1001 \u2013 Rejection of the opposition.Case T-635\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nUrteil des Gerichts (Zweite Kammer) vom 2. September 2026.#Olymp Bezner KG gegen Amt der Europ\u00e4ischen Union f\u00fcr geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke \u2013 Anmeldung einer Unionsbildmarke, die die Kombination der drei Farben Wei\u00df, Dunkelblau und Blau darstellt \u2013 Absolutes Eintragungshindernis \u2013 Fehlende Unterscheidungskraft \u2013 Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung (EU) 2017\/1001 \u2013 Begr\u00fcndungspflicht \u2013 Art. 94 der Verordnung 2017\/1001 \u2013 Gleichbehandlung.#Rechtssache T-835\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n