I cannot answer as no legal acts were provided for analysis.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a>Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026\/440 of 24\u00a0February 2026 amending Delegated Regulation (EU)\u00a02015\/63 as regards the calculation of the contributions of certain institutions, the deletion of a risk indicator and procedural modifications<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nCommission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026\/557 of 16\u00a0March 2026 supplementing Regulation (EU)\u00a02024\/3110 of the European Parliament and of the Council by determining classes of performance in relation to the essential characteristic resistance to fire<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nCommission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026\/699 of 23\u00a0March 2026 amending Regulation (EU)\u00a02018\/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the standardised access to vehicle on-board diagnostics information and repair and maintenance information, and the requirements and procedures for secure access to on-board diagnostic information<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nCouncil Directive (EU) 2026\/1194 of 26 May 2026 laying down detailed arrangements for the exercise of the right to vote and to stand as a candidate in municipal elections for Union citizens residing in a Member State of which they are not nationals (recast)<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026\/1183 of 2\u00a0June 2026 amending Implementing Regulation (EU)\u00a02015\/2447 as regards procedural rules on the preferential origin of goods<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026\/1207 of 2\u00a0June 2026 amending Annexes\u00a0V and XIV to Implementing Regulation (EU)\u00a02021\/404 as regards the entries for Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States in the lists of third countries, territories, or zones thereof authorised for the entry into the Union of consignments of poultry and germinal products of poultry, and of fresh meat of poultry and game birds<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 June 2026.GW v European Commission.Civil service \u2013 Officials \u2013 Retirement pensions \u2013 Weighting factor \u2013 Resettlement allowance \u2013 Decisions of the Swedish courts on the place of residence \u2013 Refusal to grant a certificate of residence \u2013 Recovery of overpayments \u2013 No need to adjudicate in part \u2013 Obligation to state reasons \u2013 Right to be heard \u2013 Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials \u2013 Liability.Case T-662\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.Kinova Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hannover.Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Customs union \u2013 Common Customs Tariff \u2013 Combined Nomenclature \u2013 Heading 9021 \u2013 Orthopaedic appliances \u2013 Other appliances which are worn or carried, or implanted in the body, to compensate for a defect or disability \u2013 Robotic arm attached to an electric wheelchair.Case T-313\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 June 2026.Amber Latvijas balzams AS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 Invalidity proceedings \u2013 EU figurative mark BLACK \u2013 Bad faith \u2013 Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017\/1001.Case T-284\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nArr\u00eat du Tribunal (septi\u00e8me chambre) du 3 juin 2026.#PB contre Commission europ\u00e9enne.#March\u00e9s publics de services \u2013 Prestations de services d\u2019assistance technique au Haut Conseil judiciaire et aux autorit\u00e9s ukrainiennes \u2013 Irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9s commises lors des proc\u00e9dures de passation des march\u00e9s \u2013 Recouvrement des montants ind\u00fbment vers\u00e9s aupr\u00e8s de l\u2019administrateur de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire \u2013 Mesures administratives \u2013 D\u00e9lai de prescription concernant la poursuite des irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9s \u2013 Dies a quo \u2013 Interruption de la prescription \u2013 Limite absolue s\u2019appliquant \u00e0 la prescription des poursuites d\u2019une irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 \u2013 D\u00e9cision formant titre ex\u00e9cutoire \u2013 Article 299 TFUE \u2013 Existence d\u2019une cr\u00e9ance.#Affaire T-775\/20 RENV.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nArr\u00eat du Tribunal (neuvi\u00e8me chambre \u00e9largie) du 3 juin 2026.#Lagard\u00e8re SA contre Commission europ\u00e9enne.#Concurrence \u2013 Concentrations \u2013 Demande de renseignements \u2013 Article 11, paragraphe 3, du r\u00e8glement (CE) no 139\/2004 \u2013 Caract\u00e8re n\u00e9cessaire des renseignements demand\u00e9s \u2013 D\u00e9tournement de pouvoir \u2013 Obligation de motivation \u2013 S\u00e9curit\u00e9 juridique \u2013 Proportionnalit\u00e9 \u2013 Impossibilium nulla obligatio est \u2013 Article 7 de la charte des droits fondamentaux \u2013 Droit au respect de la vie priv\u00e9e et familiale \u2013 Documents stock\u00e9s sur des outils et applications de communication personnels \u2013 Article 11 de la charte des droits fondamentaux \u2013 Libert\u00e9 d\u2019expression \u2013 Protection des sources journalistiques.#Affaire T-1119\/23.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.G Kft. v Nemzeti Ad\u00f3- \u00e9s V\u00e1mhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgat\u00f3s\u00e1ga.Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Taxation \u2013 Common system of VAT \u2013 Directive 2006\/112\/EC \u2013 Adjustment of VAT improperly invoiced \u2013 Transactions relating to a period closed by a tax inspection \u2013 National legislation making the initiation of a new inspection subject to a new fact updated by the taxpayer \u2013 Principle of effectiveness \u2013 Principle of tax neutrality \u2013 Proportionality.Case T-198\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.V\u00c1M4ALL Kft. “felsz\u00e1mol\u00e1s alatt” v Nemzeti Ad\u00f3- \u00e9s V\u00e1mhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgat\u00f3s\u00e1ga.Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Customs union \u2013 Union Customs Code \u2013 Method for determining the customs value \u2013 Declared transaction value \u2013 Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 952\/2013 \u2013 Article 140 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015\/2447 \u2013 Secondary methods \u2013 Article 74 of Regulation No 952\/2013 \u2013 Residual or \u2018fall-back\u2019 method \u2013 Article 144 of Implementing Regulation 2015\/2447 \u2013 Importation of bulk goods \u2013 Lack of proof of actual payment \u2013 Insufficient data on the essential characteristics of the goods \u2013 Use of data available in the national database \u2013 Simple arithmetic mean of unit prices.Case T-224\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 June 2026.Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Endocrinologie v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 Opposition proceedings \u2013 Application for EU figurative mark Acta Endocrinologica (Buc) \u2013 Earlier EU word mark ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA (BUC), The International Journal of Romanian Society of Endocrinology \/ Registered in 1938 New series \u2013 Relative ground for refusal \u2013 No likelihood of confusion \u2013 No similarity of the goods and services \u2013 Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017\/1001.Case T-307\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 June 2026.Osculati Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 Opposition proceedings \u2013 International registration designating the European Union \u2013 Figurative mark O \u2013 Earlier EU figurative mark O \u2013 Relative ground for refusal \u2013 Likelihood of confusion \u2013 Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017\/1001 \u2013 Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal \u2013 Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017\/1001.Case T-267\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nArr\u00eat du Tribunal (neuvi\u00e8me chambre \u00e9largie) du 3 juin 2026.#Vivendi SE contre Commission europ\u00e9enne.#Concurrence \u2013 Concentrations \u2013 Demande de renseignements \u2013 Article 11, paragraphe 3, du r\u00e8glement (CE) no 139\/2004 \u2013 Choix de la base juridique \u2013 D\u00e9tournement de pouvoir \u2013 Obligation de motivation \u2013 Absence de caract\u00e8re arbitraire \u2013 Impossibilium nulla obligatio est \u2013 Proportionnalit\u00e9 \u2013 Caract\u00e8re n\u00e9cessaire des renseignements demand\u00e9s \u2013 Article 10 de la convention des droits de l\u2019homme et des libert\u00e9s fondamentales \u2013 Libert\u00e9 d\u2019expression \u2013 Protection des sources journalistiques \u2013 Exception d\u2019ill\u00e9galit\u00e9 \u2013 Article 7 de la charte des droits fondamentaux \u2013 Droit au respect de la vie priv\u00e9e et familiale.#Affaire T-1097\/23.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.Meta Platforms, Inc. v European Commission.Digital services \u2013 Regulation EU 2022\/1925 \u2013 Designation of gatekeepers \u2013 Concept of \u2018core platform service\u2019 \u2013 Online social networking service \u2013 Number-independent interpersonal communications service \u2013 Online intermediation service \u2013 Equal treatment \u2013 Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2022\/1925 \u2013 Important gateway for business users to reach end users \u2013 Presumptions \u2013 Rebuttal of the presumptions \u2013 Article 17(1) and (3) of Regulation 2022\/1925 \u2013 Conditions for opening a market investigation \u2013 Rights of the defence \u2013 Obligation to state reasons.Case T-1078\/23.<\/strong><\/h3>\n