Okay, I will provide a short but comprehensive review of the EU legal acts you provide, focusing on the core content of each act.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a>Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026\/346 of 16\u00a0February 2026 supplementing Regulation (EU)\u00a02018\/1240 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the financial support to Member States for expenses incurred to customise and automate border checks in order to implement the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS)<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026\/996 of 29\u00a0April 2026 amending Implementing Regulations (EU)\u00a02020\/761 and (EU)\u00a02020\/1988 regarding the creation, amendment and management of certain tariff quotas following the Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026\/1003 of 27\u00a0April 2026 fixing the representative prices, import duties and additional import duties applicable to molasses in the sugar sector from 1\u00a0May 2026<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 April 2026.Stappert Magyarorsz\u00e1g Kft. v Nemzeti Ad\u00f3- \u00e9s V\u00e1mhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgat\u00f3s\u00e1ga.Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Common commercial policy \u2013 Anti-dumping duties \u2013 Imposition of definitive safeguard measures in respect of imports of certain steel products \u2013 Import of stainless steel products originating in Taiwan \u2013 Two valid order numbers \u2013 Exhaustion of one of two tariff-rate quotas \u2013 Cumulative imposition of anti-dumping duties and additional duties.Case C-115\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2026.,,Nekilnojamojo turto valdymas\u201c BUAB v Valstybin\u0117 mokes\u010di\u0173 inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finans\u0173 ministerijos.Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Common system of value added tax (VAT) \u2013 Directive 2006\/112\/EC \u2013 Article 273 \u2013 Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union \u2013 Obligations deemed necessary to ensure the correct collection of VAT and to prevent fraud \u2013 National legislation providing for a set of rules in respect of default interest relating to VAT arrears \u2013 Charging of default interest \u2013 Principle of proportionality.Case C-544\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2026.Auditeur du travail and\u00a0Others v FR.Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union \u2013 Article 10 \u2013 Member of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) \u2013 Waiver of immunity \u2013 Member whose immunity has been waived in the context of legal proceedings for criminal offences \u2013 Appointment for a new parliamentary term \u2013 No need for a further waiver of immunity for the same facts.Case C-30\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 April 2026.Yavor Markov v European Commission.Appeal \u2013 Civil service \u2013 Recruitment \u2013 Competition EPSO\/AD\/383\/21 \u2013 Decision not to include the appellant on the reserve list \u2013 Legal framework applicable to a competition \u2013 Arrangements for and duration of the oral presentation test \u2013 Legitimate expectations \u2013 Article 1(1) of Annex III to the Staff Regulations \u2013 Principle of good administration \u2013 General rules governing Open Competitions \u2013 Code of good administrative behaviour for staff of the European Commission in their relations with the public \u2013 European Parliament resolution for an open, efficient and independent European Union administration \u2013 Action for annulment and for compensation.Case C-31\/25 P.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2026.Lidl Italia Srl v Autorit\u00e0 Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM).Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Consumer protection \u2013 Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices \u2013 Directive 2005\/29\/EC \u2013 Scope \u2013 Relationship between the provisions of that directive and other EU rules regulating specific aspects of unfair commercial practices \u2013 Article 3(4) \u2013 Unfair food information practices \u2013 Regulation (EU) No 1169\/2011 \u2013 Whether there is a conflict \u2013 Complementary nature of systems of protection.Case C-301\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2026.Gesellschaft f\u00fcr musikalische Auff\u00fchrungs- und mechanische Vervielf\u00e4ltigungsrechte eV (GEMA) v VHC 2 Seniorenresidenz und Pflegeheim gGmbH.Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Intellectual property \u2013 Copyright and related rights \u2013 Directive 2001\/29\/EC \u2013 Article 3(1) \u2013 Communication to the public \u2013 Concept \u2013 Retransmission of a signal via a cable network of a retirement home \u2013 Specific technical means \u2013 New public.Case C-127\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2026.Wenzel Logistics GmbH v Mercedes-Benz Group AG.Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Competition \u2013 Article 101 TFEU \u2013 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices \u2013 Directive 2014\/104\/EU \u2013 Article 3(2) \u2013 Right to full compensation for harm caused by a cartel \u2013 Payment of interest \u2013 Article 22(2) \u2013 Temporal application of national transposition provisions \u2013 Determination of the date from which interest is due \u2013 Time when the harm occurred in the case of the acquisition of goods at inflated prices.Case C-191\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2026.Okresn\u00e1 prokurat\u00fara Bratislava III v AC.Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Area of freedom, security and justice \u2013 Judicial cooperation in criminal matters \u2013 Directive (EU) 2016\/343 \u2013 Articles 3 and 4 \u2013 Presumption of innocence \u2013 Article 48(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union \u2013 Order that no further action be taken \u2013 Judicial decision that is not a decision on guilt \u2013 Setting aside and referral back to a lower court \u2013 Findings made by the higher court as to whether the constituent elements of the offence concerned are present \u2013 Obligation on the part of the lower court to comply with the rulings of the higher court \u2013 Appropriate measures in the event of breach of the presumption of innocence.Case C-748\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 April 2026.CD Tondela \u2013 Futebol, SAD and\u00a0Others v Autoridade da Concorr\u00eancia.Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Competition \u2013 Professional football \u2013 No-poach-of-players agreement, concluded by a national sports association and a group of clubs following the suspension of the 2019\/2020 sporting season due to the COVID-19 pandemic \u2013 Article 101(1) TFEU \u2013 Restriction of competition by object or by effect \u2013 Labour market \u2013 Recruitment of players by clubs \u2013 Unilateral termination of employment contract by players \u2013 Expiration of employment contract \u2013 Content of the agreement \u2013 Economic and legal context surrounding the agreement \u2013 Competition-related objective aims of the agreement \u2013 Whether justified \u2013 Conditions \u2013 Pursuit of legitimate objectives in the public interest \u2013 Necessity \u2013 Justification.Case C-133\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 April 2026.AS v BNP Paribas Bank Polska S.A.Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Unfair terms in consumer contracts \u2013 Directive 93\/13\/EEC \u2013 Effects of a finding that a term is unfair \u2013 Addendum to a mortgage loan agreement \u2013 Consequences of the nullity of that addendum on the validity of that contract \u2013 Principles of effectiveness and proportionality \u2013 Deterrent effect \u2013 Conditions for the continued existence of the contract \u2013 Obligations of the national court.Case C-246\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 April 2026.European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria.Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations \u2013 Article 258 TFEU \u2013 Directive (EU) 2019\/520 \u2013 Interoperability of electronic road toll systems and facilitation of cross-border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees in the European Union \u2013 Failure to transpose \u2013 Failure to notify potential transposition measures \u2013 Article 260(3) TFEU \u2013 Application for an order to pay a lump sum.Case C-479\/23.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nEnhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Uzbekistan, of the other part<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nAction brought on 17\u00a0March 2026 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against Iceland (Case E-2\/26)<\/strong><\/h3>\n