{"id":16372,"date":"2026-04-30T10:19:25","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T07:19:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2026\/04\/review-of-the-eu-legislation-for-30-04-2026\/"},"modified":"2026-04-30T10:19:25","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T07:19:25","slug":"review-of-the-eu-legislation-for-30-04-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2026\/04\/review-of-the-eu-legislation-for-30-04-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Review of the EU legislation for 30\/04\/2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

“`html<\/p>\n

Review of each of legal acts published today:<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/p>\n

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026\/346 of 16\u00a0February 2026 supplementing Regulation (EU)\u00a02018\/1240 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the financial support to Member States for expenses incurred to customise and automate border checks in order to implement the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS)<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026\/339 of 16\u00a0February 2026 repealing Delegated Regulation (EU)\u00a02022\/30<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026\/996 of 29\u00a0April 2026 amending Implementing Regulations (EU)\u00a02020\/761 and (EU)\u00a02020\/1988 regarding the creation, amendment and management of certain tariff quotas following the Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026\/1003 of 27\u00a0April 2026 fixing the representative prices, import duties and additional import duties applicable to molasses in the sugar sector from 1\u00a0May 2026<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.Isabel S\u00e1nchez v European Commission.Civil service \u2013 Officials \u2013 Recruitment \u2013 Notice of competition \u2013 Open competition EPSO\/AD\/391\/21 \u2013 Decision not to place the applicant\u2019s name on the reserve list \u2013 Equal treatment \u2013 Normalisation of marks \u2013 Obligation to state reasons \u2013 Rights of the defence \u2013 Principle of good administration \u2013 Duration of the administrative procedure \u2013 Reasonable period of time.Case T-229\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU design \u2013 Invalidity proceedings \u2013 Registered EU design representing doors \u2013 Disclosure of the earlier design \u2013 Proof of the disclosure \u2013 Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6\/2002.Case T-580\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat du Tribunal (septi\u00e8me chambre) du 29 avril 2026.#Wazdan Innovations ltd. contre Office de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne pour la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle.#Marque de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne \u2013 Demande de marque de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne verbale 3 Coins \u2013 Motif absolu de refus \u2013 Absence de caract\u00e8re distinctif \u2013 Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b), du r\u00e8glement (UE) 2017\/1001.#Affaire T-123\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat du Tribunal (quatri\u00e8me chambre \u00e9largie) du 29 avril 2026.#TC contre Parlement europ\u00e9en.#Droit institutionnel \u2013 R\u00e9glementation concernant les frais et indemnit\u00e9s des d\u00e9put\u00e9s au Parlement \u2013 Indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019assistance parlementaire \u2013 Recouvrement des sommes ind\u00fbment vers\u00e9es \u2013 Obligation de motivation \u2013 Erreur d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation.#Affaire T-309\/21 RENV.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 29 April 2026.Groupvet EE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 Opposition Proceedings \u2013 Application for the EU figurative mark ALFAVET \u2013 Earlier EU figurative mark alfavet \u2013 Relative ground for refusal \u2013 Likelihood of confusion \u2013 Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017\/1001.Case T-403\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 April 2026.Hauptzollamt A v Scrap-Transporteur.Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Taxation \u2013 Excise duties \u2013 Excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco \u2013 Smoking tobacco \u2013 Concept of \u2018tobacco capable of being smoked without further industrial processing\u2019 \u2013 Article 5(1)(a) of Directive 2011\/64\/UE \u2013 Scraps of raw tobacco, uncut but threshed and stripped, capable of being processed into water-pipe tobacco through a complex process carried out at home by the consumer.Case T-194\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 29 April 2026.HI v European Parliament.Civil service \u2013 Officials \u2013 Reports procedure \u2013 2022 appraisal procedure \u2013 Staff report \u2013 Impartiality \u2013 Duty of care \u2013 Protection of personal data \u2013 Article 43 of the Staff Regulations \u2013 Internal rules on staff reports \u2013 Manifest error of assessment.Case T-30\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat du Tribunal (dixi\u00e8me chambre) du 29 avril 2026.#Dmitry Konov contre Conseil de l’Union europ\u00e9enne.#Politique \u00e9trang\u00e8re et de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 commune \u2013 Mesures restrictives prises eu \u00e9gard aux actions compromettant ou mena\u00e7ant l\u2019int\u00e9grit\u00e9 territoriale, la souverainet\u00e9 et l\u2019ind\u00e9pendance de l\u2019Ukraine \u2013 Gel des fonds \u2013 Liste des personnes, des entit\u00e9s et des organismes auxquels s\u2019applique le gel des fonds et des ressources \u00e9conomiques \u2013 Inscription et maintien du nom du requ\u00e9rant sur la liste \u2013 Notion de \u201cfemme ou homme d\u2019affaires influent ayant une activit\u00e9 en Russie\u201d \u2013 Notion de \u201cfemme ou homme d\u2019affaires ayant une activit\u00e9 dans des secteurs \u00e9conomiques qui fournissent une source substantielle de revenus au gouvernement de la F\u00e9d\u00e9ration de Russie\u201d \u2013 Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous g), de la d\u00e9cision 2014\/145\/PESC \u2013 Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous g), du r\u00e8glement (UE) no 269\/2014 \u2013 Droit \u00e0 une protection juridictionnelle effective \u2013 Obligation de motivation \u2013 Erreur d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation \u2013 Proportionnalit\u00e9 \u2013 \u00c9galit\u00e9 de traitement \u2013 Droit de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 \u2013 Libert\u00e9 d\u2019entreprise \u2013 Droit au respect de la vie priv\u00e9e \u2013 Responsabilit\u00e9 non contractuelle.#Affaire T-600\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU design \u2013 Invalidity proceedings \u2013 Registered EU design representing doors \u2013 Disclosure of the earlier design \u2013 Proof of the disclosure \u2013 Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6\/2002.Case T-578\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU design \u2013 Invalidity proceedings \u2013 Registered EU design representing doors \u2013 Disclosure of the earlier design \u2013 Proof of the disclosure \u2013 Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6\/2002.Case T-579\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat du Tribunal (septi\u00e8me chambre) du 29 avril 2026.#Wazdan Innovations ltd. contre Office de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne pour la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle.#Marque de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne \u2013 Demande de marque de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne verbale 5 Coins \u2013 Motif absolu de refus \u2013 Absence de caract\u00e8re distinctif \u2013 Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b), du r\u00e8glement (UE) 2017\/1001.#Affaire T-124\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.Fisher Investments Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 Applications for EU figurative marks FI \u2013 Absolute ground for refusal \u2013 Descriptiveness \u2013 Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017\/1001.Case T-465\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat du Tribunal (septi\u00e8me chambre) du 29 avril 2026.#Wazdan Innovations ltd. contre Office de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne pour la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle.#Marque de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne \u2013 Demande de marque de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne verbale 1 Coin \u2013 Motif absolu de refus \u2013 Absence de caract\u00e8re distinctif \u2013 Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b), du r\u00e8glement (UE) 2017\/1001.#Affaire T-122\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.Romagnoli Fratelli SpA v Community Plant Variety Office.Plant varieties \u2013 Grant of a Community plant variety right for the potato variety Melrose \u2013 Failure to pay the annual fee on time \u2013 Cancellation of right \u2013 Application for restitutio in integrum \u2013 Competence of the Board of Appeal \u2013 Concept of \u2018particular circumstances\u2019 \u2013 Conditions for notification of decisions and communications of the CPVO.Case T-573\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“`html Review of each of legal acts published today: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026\/346 of 16\u00a0February 2026 supplementing Regulation (EU)\u00a02018\/1240 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the financial support to Member States for expenses incurred to customise and automate border checks in order to implement the European Travel Information and Authorisation…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-eu-legislation-detailed","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16372"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16372\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}