{"id":15982,"date":"2026-04-03T10:08:44","date_gmt":"2026-04-03T07:08:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2026\/04\/ruling-of-the-second-senate-of-the-constitutional-court-of-ukraine-on-the-consolidation-of-constitutional-proceedings-in-the-case-under-the-constitutional-complaint-of-samborska-tetiana-leonidivna-reg\/"},"modified":"2026-04-03T10:08:44","modified_gmt":"2026-04-03T07:08:44","slug":"ruling-of-the-second-senate-of-the-constitutional-court-of-ukraine-on-the-consolidation-of-constitutional-proceedings-in-the-case-under-the-constitutional-complaint-of-samborska-tetiana-leonidivna-reg","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2026\/04\/ruling-of-the-second-senate-of-the-constitutional-court-of-ukraine-on-the-consolidation-of-constitutional-proceedings-in-the-case-under-the-constitutional-complaint-of-samborska-tetiana-leonidivna-reg\/","title":{"rendered":"Ruling of the Second Senate of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on the Consolidation of Constitutional Proceedings in the Case under the Constitutional Complaint of Samborska Tetiana Leonidivna Regarding the Compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (Constitutionality) of Parts One, Two of Article 303 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine and in the Case under the Constitutional Complaint of Pomirko Tetiana Ivanivna Regarding the Compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (Constitutionality) of Part Two of Article 303 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Good day!<\/p>\n<p>1.  **Essence of the Act:** This act is a ruling of the Second Senate of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on the consolidation of two constitutional proceedings into one. Both proceedings concern the issue of the constitutionality of certain provisions of Article 303 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, which regulates the appeal of decisions, actions or omissions of an investigator, prosecutor during a pre-trial investigation.<\/p>\n<p>2.  **Structure and Main Provisions:**<br \/>\n    *   The ruling consists of an introductory part, a descriptive part, a reasoning part, and a operative part.<br \/>\n    *   The descriptive part states the fact of the opening of two separate constitutional proceedings based on the complaints of Samborska T.L. and Pomirko T.I. regarding the constitutionality of Article 303 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine.<br \/>\n    *   The reasoning part states that both complaints relate to the same issue, namely the constitutionality of the second part of Article 303 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, which is the basis for consolidating the proceedings in accordance with the Law of Ukraine &#8220;On the Constitutional Court of Ukraine&#8221;.<br \/>\n    *   The operative part contains a decision to consolidate constitutional proceedings into one and to appoint Judge Pervomaiskyi O.O. as the reporting judge in the consolidated case.<\/p>\n<p>3.  **Key Provisions for Use:**<br \/>\n    *   This ruling is important for understanding the procedure for consolidating constitutional proceedings if the Constitutional Court receives appeals relating to the same issue.<br \/>\n    *   It shows that the Constitutional Court may consolidate proceedings for a more efficient consideration of issues that have a common subject of appeal.<br \/>\n    *   The ruling confirms that the subject of review is the constitutionality of the provisions of Article 303 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, which relate to appeals against decisions, actions or omissions of an investigator, prosecutor.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/go\/v006u710-26\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Good day! 1. **Essence of the Act:** This act is a ruling of the Second Senate of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on the consolidation of two constitutional proceedings into one. Both proceedings concern the issue of the constitutionality of certain provisions of Article 303 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, which regulates the&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[15,45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15982","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ukrainian-legislation-general-en","category-ukrainian-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15982","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15982"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15982\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15982"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15982"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15982"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}