Here’s a breakdown of the key changes introduced by the two Commission Delegated Regulations you’ve provided:<\/p>\n
This regulation amends Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023\/333 to improve how multiple identities are detected across EU information systems. The core change is the inclusion of data from the \u2018Eurodac\u2019 database in the identity comparison process. Specifically:<\/p>\n
In essence, this regulation expands the scope of data used to identify potential multiple identities by incorporating Eurodac data, which includes details like names, nationalities, date and place of birth, and sex.<\/p>\n
This regulation amends Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023\/332 with a similar objective: to enhance the interoperability of EU information systems for police, judicial cooperation, asylum, and migration by refining the multiple-identity detection process. The key feature is again the inclusion of ‘Eurodac’ data.<\/p>\n
The core change is expanding the data pool used for creating links between different EU information systems to include Eurodac data. This aims to improve the accuracy of identity checks and combat identity fraud.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\n This Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026\/327 amends Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023\/333, which supplements Regulation (EU) 2019\/817. The core objective is to refine the process of detecting multiple identities across EU information systems. This is achieved by specifying the criteria for determining when identity data is considered the same or similar, which is crucial for the interoperability framework between EU information systems.<\/p>\n The regulation consists of three articles and an annex. Article 1 amends Article 1 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023\/333 by inserting a new point (i) that lists identity data from \u2018Eurodac\u2019 to be compared in the multiple-identity detection process. Article 2 amends Annexes I and II of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023\/333, updating tables related to data categories for identity comparison. Article 3 states that the regulation will enter into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The annex provides the specific amendments to Annexes I and II of the original Delegated Regulation, detailing changes to tables that outline data categories such as names, dates of birth, gender, nationality, and place of birth across various EU information systems like SIS, EES, ETIAS, ECRIS-TCN, VIS, and Eurodac. The main change is the inclusion of Eurodac data in the comparison process.<\/p>\n The most important provision of this regulation is the inclusion of \u2018Eurodac\u2019 data in the multiple-identity detection process. This means that the identity data stored in Eurodac, which includes surname(s) and forename(s), name(s) at birth and previously used names and any aliases; nationality(ies); date of birth; place of birth and sex, will now be compared with data in other EU information systems. This addition aims to enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of identity checks, helping to identify individuals who may be registered under different identities across various systems.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\n This Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026\/326 amends Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023\/332, focusing on the interoperability of EU information systems in the fields of police, judicial cooperation, asylum, and migration. The key aim is to refine the process of detecting multiple identities across different EU databases. This is achieved by specifying how identity data is compared to determine if it should be considered the same or similar, which is crucial for creating links between data in various EU information systems.<\/p>\n The regulation consists of three articles and an annex. Article 1 modifies Article 1 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023\/332 by inserting a new point (i) that lists specific identity data from the ‘Eurodac’ system (Regulation (EU) 2024\/1358) to be included in the multiple-identity detection process. This includes surnames, forenames, names at birth, previously used names, aliases, nationalities, date of birth, place of birth, and sex. Article 2 amends Annexes I and II of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023\/332, with detailed changes outlined in the Annex of this regulation. Article 3 states that the regulation will come into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The annex provides specific amendments to tables in Annexes I and II of the original regulation, detailing which data categories from various systems (SIS, EES, ETIAS, ECRIS-TCN, VIS, and Eurodac) are to be compared for identity detection.<\/p>\n The most important provision of this act is the inclusion of Eurodac data in the multiple-identity detection process. This means that the regulation expands the scope of identity data considered for creating links between different EU information systems, which is essential for accurate identification and combating identity fraud.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a>Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026\/327 of 3\u00a0December 2025 amending Delegated Regulation (EU)\u00a02023\/333 supplementing Regulation (EU)\u00a02019\/817 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards determining cases where identity data are considered as same or similar for the purpose of the multiple identity detection<\/strong><\/h3>\n
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026\/326 of 3\u00a0December 2025 amending Delegated Regulation (EU)\u00a02023\/332 supplementing Regulation (EU)\u00a02019\/818 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards determining cases where identity data are considered as same or similar for the purpose of the multiple identity detection<\/strong><\/h3>\n
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026\/323 of 29\u00a0October 2025 amending Delegated Regulation (EU)\u00a02022\/805 as regards fees for the supervision by the European Securities and Markets Authority of benchmark administrators endorsing third-country benchmarks<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026\/286 of 10\u00a0February 2026 authorising an exemption pursuant to Regulation (EU)\u00a02024\/573 of the European Parliament and of the Council, with regard to the use of fluorinated greenhouse gases in certain chillers used for semiconductor manufacturing<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026\/312 of 10\u00a0February 2026 renewing the approval of the active substance maltodextrin as a low-risk active substance in accordance with Regulation (EC) No\u00a01107\/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No\u00a0540\/2011<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026\/342 of 10\u00a0February 2026 amending Annexes\u00a0V and XIV to Implementing Regulation (EU)\u00a02021\/404 as regards the entries for Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States in the lists of third countries, territories, or zones thereof authorised for the entry into the Union of consignments of poultry and germinal products of poultry, and of fresh meat of poultry and game birds<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 11 February 2026.I. S.A. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej.Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Taxation \u2013 Common system of VAT \u2013 Right to deduct input VAT \u2013 Article 167, Article 168(a) and Article 178(a) of Directive 2006\/112\/EC \u2013 Issuing of the invoice showing the VAT during the tax period following that in respect of which the right of deduction is exercised \u2013 Fiscal neutrality and proportionality.Case T-689\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nArr\u00eat du Tribunal (cinqui\u00e8me chambre) du 11 f\u00e9vrier 2026.#Maya Tokareva contre Conseil de l’Union europ\u00e9enne.#Politique \u00e9trang\u00e8re et de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 commune \u2013 Mesures restrictives prises eu \u00e9gard aux actions compromettant ou mena\u00e7ant l\u2019int\u00e9grit\u00e9 territoriale, la souverainet\u00e9 et l\u2019ind\u00e9pendance de l\u2019Ukraine \u2013 Gel des fonds \u2013 Liste des personnes, des entit\u00e9s et des organismes auxquels s\u2019applique le gel des fonds et des ressources \u00e9conomiques \u2013 R\u00e9inscription du nom du requ\u00e9rant sur la liste \u2013 Notion d\u2019\u201cavantage tir\u00e9 d\u2019une femme ou d\u2019un homme d\u2019affaires influent exer\u00e7ant des activit\u00e9s en Russie\u201d \u2013 Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous g), de la d\u00e9cision 2014\/145\/PESC \u2013 Erreur d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation \u2013 Article 266 TFUE.#Affaire T-693\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 February 2026.Nutris We care about you, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 Opposition proceedings \u2013 Application for the EU figurative mark ProbioDefend \u2013 Earlier EU word mark Defendyl \u2013 Relative ground for refusal \u2013 Likelihood of confusion \u2013 Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017\/1001.Case T-209\/25.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.Zak\u0142ady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A. v European Commission.Medicinal products for human use \u2013 Revocation of the marketing authorisation for Dimethyl Fumarate Polpharma \u2013 dimethyl fumarate, a medicinal product for human use \u2013 Directive 2001\/83\/EC \u2013 Regulation (EC) No 726\/2004 \u2013 Article 266 TFEU.Case T-1183\/23.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.Athom Holding BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark \u2013 Opposition proceedings \u2013 Application for the EU figurative mark athom Smart Home \u2013 Earlier international word mark ATHOM \u2013 Relative ground for refusal \u2013 Similarity of goods \u2013 Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017\/1001.Case T-618\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nJudgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 11 February 2026.Centrul Rom\u00e2n pentru Administrarea Drepturilor Arti\u0219tilor Interpre\u021bi (Credidam) v Cristian General Serv SRL.Reference for a preliminary ruling \u2013 Taxation \u2013 Common system of value added tax \u2013 Taxable transactions \u2013 Concept of \u2018supply of services for consideration\u2019 \u2013 Article 2(1)(c), Article 24(1) and Article 25(a) and (c) of Directive 2006\/112\/EC \u2013 Taxable amount \u2013 Concept of \u2018consideration\u2019 \u2013 Article 73 and point (a) of the first paragraph of Article 78 of Directive 2006\/112 \u2013 Holders of related rights \u2013 Communication of phonograms and audiovisual programmes without a licence \u2013 Remuneration paid to the collective management organisation \u2013 Surcharge.Case T-643\/24.<\/strong><\/h3>\n