{"id":14000,"date":"2025-12-17T09:18:13","date_gmt":"2025-12-17T07:18:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/12\/review-of-ukrainian-legislation-for-17-12-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-12-17T09:18:13","modified_gmt":"2025-12-17T07:18:13","slug":"review-of-ukrainian-legislation-for-17-12-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/12\/review-of-ukrainian-legislation-for-17-12-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Review of Ukrainian legislation for 17\/12\/2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!DOCTYPE html><\/p>\n<p><head><br \/>\n<meta charset=\"utf-8\"\/><br \/>\n<meta content=\"width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0\" name=\"viewport\"\/><br \/>\n<title>Digest of Legislation<\/title><br \/>\n<\/head><\/p>\n<h4>Digest of Legislative Changes<\/h4>\n<h5>Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine Regarding the Time Limits for Appealing to the Court for the Recovery of Wages<\/h5>\n<p>The Constitutional Court declared unconstitutional the three-month limitation for appealing to the court with a claim for the recovery of wages. The court decided that such a restriction violates the right to timely payment of wages, guaranteed by the Constitution. Employees now have more time to apply to the court for the recovery of wages. Courts cannot refuse to consider lawsuits solely on the basis of the expiration of the three-month period.<\/p>\n<h5>Resolution of the National Bank of Ukraine on Foreign Exchange Operations of the Ministry of Defense<\/h5>\n<p>The National Bank of Ukraine has allowed the Ministry of Defense to carry out foreign exchange operations to support foreign business trips of delegations headed by the Minister of Defense or his deputies. This will simplify and speed up the provision of necessary resources to representatives of the Ministry of Defense abroad. The changes apply only to delegations headed by the Minister of Defense or his deputies.<\/p>\n<h5>Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on Refusal to Open Proceedings on a Complaint Against the CPC<\/h5>\n<p>The Constitutional Court of Ukraine refused to open constitutional proceedings on a complaint regarding certain provisions of the CPC, recognizing it as inadmissible due to insufficient substantiation of claims regarding the unconstitutionality of the norms. For a successful appeal of a law in the Constitutional Court, it is necessary to clearly show which constitutional right was violated and how exactly the appealed norm led to this violation.<\/p>\n<h5>Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 1629 on the Use of Funds for the Termination of State Unitary Enterprises<\/h5>\n<p>The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has determined the procedure for using funds from the state budget allocated to the State Property Fund for the closure of state unitary enterprises. Funds can be used only in case of insufficient own funds of the enterprise being terminated. The State Property Fund is obliged to report monthly on the use of funds and to publish this information.<\/p>\n<h5>Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 1626 on Changes in the Field of Prevention of Industrial Pollution<\/h5>\n<p>The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has made changes to government decisions in the field of prevention of industrial pollution. The changes align the normImplementing the legislative and regulatory framework in accordance with the requirements of the Law of Ukraine &#8220;On Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control&#8221; and introducing integrated environmental permits. Business entities need to consider the changes when obtaining or reissuing permits and pay attention to the new requirements for monitoring emissions and discharges of pollutants.<\/p>\n<p>## Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on the Redistribution of Expenditures of the Ministry of Social Policy<\/p>\n<p>The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine redistributed funds within the budget program related to subventions to local budgets for housing needs. Consumption expenditures were reduced and development expenditures were increased by UAH 170,900.62 thousand. This may affect the implementation of projects for the construction, reconstruction, and conversion of housing for temporary residence funds.<\/p>\n<p>## Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on the Allocation of Funds for the Elimination of the Consequences of an Emergency in the Ternopil Region<\/p>\n<p>The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine allocated UAH 30.8 million for the elimination of the consequences of a military emergency in the Ternopil Region. The funds were allocated from the reserve fund of the state budget on a non-refundable basis. The regional administration is obliged to approve a list of expenses within a week and submit a report on the use of funds by the end of December 2025.<\/p>\n<p>## Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on Approval of the Action Plan for Preparing for Associated Participation in the Erasmus+ Program<\/p>\n<p>The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine approved an action plan aimed at preparing Ukraine for associated participation in the European Union&#8217;s Erasmus+ program. Key areas include developing a mechanism for interagency cooperation, holding consultations with the EU, raising awareness among Ukrainian participants, and analyzing readiness to participate in the program.<\/p>\n<p>## Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on the Transfer of Immovable Property to the Ownership of the Krasnopillia Community<\/p>\n<p>The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine transferred buildings and structures, including a civil defense protective structure, to the ownership of the Krasnopillia Community of the Sumy Region. The community is now responsible for the maintenance and proper use of this structure.<\/p>\n<p>## Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on Changes in the Activities of the Ministry of Social Policy, Family and Unity<\/p>\n<p>The government has expanded the powers of the Ministry of Social Policy, Family and Unity regarding internally displaced<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Review of each of legal acts published today:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>### **On the accounting price of banking metals**<\/p>\n<p>This is a notification from the National Bank of Ukraine, dated December 16, 2025, establishing accounting prices for banking metals, namely gold, silver, platinum, and palladium. These prices are indicated per one troy ounce of each metal. It is important to note that the NBU is not obligated to buy or sell these metals at the specified accounting prices.<\/p>\n<p>The structure of the notification is simple: it contains a table with codes (numeric and alphabetic), the number of troy ounces, the name of the banking metal, and its accounting price.<\/p>\n<p>The main provision to consider when using this information is that the accounting prices are indicative and are not binding for transactions with banking metals by the National Bank of Ukraine.<\/p>\n<p>### **On the official exchange rate of the hryvnia against foreign currencies**<\/p>\n<p>This document is an official notification from the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) on establishing the official exchange rate of the hryvnia against foreign currencies and SDRs (Special Drawing Rights) for a specific date \u2013 December 16, 2025.<\/p>\n<p>The structure of the document is simple: it is a table containing a list of foreign currencies and SDRs, their numeric and alphabetic codes, the number of units of currency\/SDR, and the official exchange rate of the hryvnia to them. It is important to note that these rates are used for reflection in accounting, for NBU transactions with the State Treasury Service of Ukraine (DKSU), and in other cases defined by law.<\/p>\n<p>The most important provision is that the NBU does not undertake obligations to buy or sell the specified currencies at these rates. This means that the official exchange rate of the hryvnia established by the NBU may differ from the market rate at which the currency can be bought or sold in banks or exchange offices.<\/p>\n<p>### **Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case on the constitutional petition of the Supreme Court regarding the compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of Part One of Article 233 of the Labor Code of Ukraine (case regarding the terms of an employee&#8217;s appeal to the court for the recovery of wages and other payments due to the employee)**<\/p>\n<p>Good day! Let&#8217;s consider the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine regarding the terms of appeal to the court for the recovery of wages.<\/p>\n<p>1.  **Essence of the decision:** The Constitutional Court declared unconstitutional the provision of the Labor Code, which limits to three months the term for an employee to appeal to the court for the recovery of wages and other payments. The Court decided that such a restriction violates the right to timely receipt of<br \/>\nremuneration for labor, guaranteed by the Constitution of Ukraine.<\/p>\n<p>2. **Structure and Main Provisions:**<br \/>\n    * The Constitutional Court considered the submission of the Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of the first part of Article 233 of the Labor Code of Ukraine.<br \/>\n    * The Court analyzed the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine, in particular Articles 8, 43, and 55, as well as the practice of the European Court of Human Rights.<br \/>\n    * It found that the limitation of the term for applying to the court to three months is excessively short and does not take into account the ongoing nature of the employer&#8217;s obligations to pay wages.<br \/>\n    * The decision repeals the validity of the first part of Article 233 of the Labor Code of Ukraine regarding the establishment of a three-month period for an employee to apply to the court for the recovery of wages and other payments due to the employee.<\/p>\n<p>3. **Important Provisions for Use:**<br \/>\n    * Employees now have more time to apply to the court with claims for the recovery of wages, as the three-month period has been declared unconstitutional.<br \/>\n    * Courts must take into account that the obligation to pay wages is ongoing and cannot refuse to consider claims solely on the basis of the expiration of the three-month period.<br \/>\n    * This decision provides greater protection for employees&#8217; rights to timely remuneration for work and effective judicial protection.<\/p>\n<p>I hope this explanation was helpful.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/go\/v0144500-25\"><\/p>\n<h3><strong>On Amending Resolution No. 18 of the Board of the National Bank of Ukraine dated February 24, 2022<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Good day! Here is a brief analysis of the provided act:<\/p>\n<p>1. **Essence of the Law:** This resolution of the National Bank of Ukraine amends the previous resolution No. 18 dated February 24, 2022, which regulates the operation of the banking system under martial law. The changes concern the possibility for the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine to conduct foreign exchange operations to support foreign business trips of delegations headed by the Minister of Defense or his deputies.<\/p>\n<p>2. **Structure and Main Provisions:**<br \/>\n    * The resolution consists of two points.<br \/>\n    * Point 1 amends resolution No. 18, namely:<br \/>\n        * Supplements point 5 with a new subparagraph 13, allowing the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine to support delegations on business trips.<br \/>\n        * Supplements point 12 with a new subparagraph 20, allowing the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine to purchase foreign currency for the same purposes.<br \/>\n        * Makes a technical correction to subparagraph 1 of point 14.<br \/>\n    * Point 2 specifies the date of entry into force of the resolution \u2013 the day following its official publication.<\/p>\n<p>3. **Most Important Provisions:**<br \/>\n    * Permission for the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine to purchase foreign currency and<br \/>\nto conduct foreign exchange transactions to support foreign business trips of delegations headed by the Minister of Defense or his deputies. This simplifies and speeds up the process of providing the necessary resources for representatives of the Ministry of Defense abroad.<br \/>\n    *   It is worth noting that the changes apply only to delegations headed by the Minister of Defense of Ukraine or his deputies.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/go\/v094u710-25\"><\/p>\n<h3><strong>Ruling of the Second Senate of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on Refusal to Open Constitutional Proceedings in the Case Based on the Constitutional Complaint of Borodina Liliia Volodymyrivna Regarding the Compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (Constitutionality) of Certain Provisions of Articles 284, 392 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Good day!<\/p>\n<p>1.  **Essence of the Decision:** The Constitutional Court of Ukraine refused to open constitutional proceedings on a complaint from an individual who challenged the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine (hereinafter &#8211; CPC). The complainant argued that the absence in Article 284 of the CPC of a provision on the closure of criminal proceedings in the event of the establishment of violations of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights by the European Court, as well as the impossibility of appealing a ruling refusing to close the proceedings, are unconstitutional.<\/p>\n<p>2.  **Structure of the Decision:** The ruling consists of descriptive and reasoning parts. The descriptive part outlines the essence of the complaint, the complainant&#8217;s justification, and previous court decisions in her case. In the reasoning part, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine explains the reasons for refusing to open the proceedings, referring to the fact that the complainant did not adequately substantiate how the challenged provisions of the CPC violate her constitutional rights.<\/p>\n<p>3.  **Key Provisions:** The most important provision is that the Constitutional Court of Ukraine found the constitutional complaint inadmissible due to the lack of adequate substantiation of the claims regarding the unconstitutionality of the challenged provisions of the CPC. This means that for a successful challenge of a law in the Constitutional Court, it is necessary to clearly show which constitutional right was violated and how the challenged provision led to this violation.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/go\/1629-2025-%D0%BF\"><\/p>\n<h3><strong>On Approval of the Procedure for Using Funds Provided in the State Budget for the Implementation of Measures Related to the Termination of State Unitary Enterprises in Accordance with the Law of Ukraine \u201cOn Peculiarities of Termination of State Enterprises by Decision of the State Property Fund of Ukraine\u201d<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Good day! Let&#8217;s consider Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 1629 dated December 10, 2025, which approves the Procedure for Using Funds for the termination of stateof State Unitary Enterprises.<\/p>\n<p>1.  **Essence of the Law:** This Procedure defines how to use funds from the state budget allocated to the State Property Fund (SPF) for the closure of state unitary enterprises. It regulates the financing of expenses related to this process, including payment for the services of the termination manager, maintenance of property, payments to employees, and other necessary expenses. The procedure aims to ensure the transparent and efficient use of budget funds during the termination of such enterprises.<\/p>\n<p>2.  **Structure and Main Provisions:**<br \/>\n    *   The Procedure consists of 10 clauses that define the mechanism for using budget funds allocated for measures related to the termination of state unitary enterprises.<br \/>\n    *   The SPF is the main manager of these funds and is responsible for their targeted use.<br \/>\n    *   It determines which expenses can be covered by these funds, including payment for the services of the termination manager, maintenance of property, payments to employees, and court costs.<br \/>\n    *   The Procedure also establishes requirements for reporting and control over the use of funds.<\/p>\n<p>3.  **Main Provisions for Use:**<br \/>\n    *   Funds can only be used if the enterprise being terminated lacks its own funds.<br \/>\n    *   All expenses must be documented and agreed upon with the SPF.<br \/>\n    *   The SPF is obliged to report monthly on the use of funds and publish this information on its website.<br \/>\n    *   The remaining funds at the end of the budget period are subject to return to the state budget.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/go\/1626-2025-%D0%BF\"><\/p>\n<h3>**On Amendments to Certain Resolutions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine in the Field of Prevention, Reduction, and Control of Industrial Pollution**<\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Good day! Let&#8217;s consider the main provisions of Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 1626 of December 10, 2025.<\/p>\n<p>1.  **Essence of the Law:**<br \/>\n    This resolution amends a number of government decisions in the field of prevention, reduction, and control of industrial pollution. The changes are aimed at harmonizing the regulatory framework with the requirements of the Law of Ukraine &#8220;On Integrated Prevention and Control of Industrial Pollution&#8221; and implementing integrated environmental permits.<\/p>\n<p>2.  **Structure and Main Provisions:**<\/p>\n<p>    *   **Amendments to the list of pollutants:** The requirements for the regulation of discharges of pollutants into water bodies are clarified, in particular, substances specified in the National Pollutant Release and Transfer Register are taken into account.<br \/>\n    *   **State registration of objects:** The Ministry of Economy carries out the state registration of objects on the territory of which there are installations that are operated on the basis of an integrated environmental permit.<br \/>\nresolution.<br \/>\n    *   **Emission permits:** The validity period of permits for emissions of pollutants into the atmospheric air, obtained before the entry into force of the Law of Ukraine &#8220;On Integrated Prevention and Control of Industrial Pollution,&#8221; is established.<br \/>\n    *   **Special water use permits:** The procedure for obtaining special water use permits in connection with obtaining an integrated environmental permit is regulated.<br \/>\n    *   **Environmental impact assessment:** The criteria for determining planned activities that are not subject to environmental impact assessment are applied for the purposes of the Law of Ukraine &#8220;On Integrated Prevention and Control of Industrial Pollution.&#8221;<br \/>\n    *   **State supervision (control):** The effect of the resolution on the suspension of state supervision (control) measures during martial law does not extend to inspections related to obtaining an integrated environmental permit.<br \/>\n    *   **Automated emission monitoring systems:** The introduction of mandatory automated emission monitoring systems for business entities operating under an integrated environmental permit.<br \/>\n    *   **Monitoring of waste treatment facilities:** Requirements for monitoring waste treatment facilities are clarified, in particular, taking into account integrated environmental permits.<br \/>\n    *   **Permits for waste treatment operations:** The procedure for obtaining permits for waste treatment operations in connection with obtaining an integrated environmental permit is regulated.<br \/>\n    *   **Technical requirements for the operation of waste incineration plants:** Amendments are made to the technical requirements for the operation of waste incineration plants and waste co-incineration plants.<br \/>\n    *   **Restrictions on the rights of water users:** The provisions on establishing restrictions on the rights of water users who carry out special water use, taking into account integrated environmental permits, are clarified.<\/p>\n<p>3.  **Key provisions for use:**<\/p>\n<p>    *   **Transition to integrated environmental permits:** Business entities whose activities fall under the Law of Ukraine &#8220;On Integrated Prevention and Control of Industrial Pollution&#8221; must take into account the changes when obtaining or reissuing permits.<br \/>\n    *   **Monitoring and control requirements:** Enterprises should pay attention to the new requirements for monitoring emissions and discharges of pollutants, as well as for waste accounting.<br \/>\n    *   **Validity of existing permits:** It is important to consider the limited validity of permits obtained before the entry into force of the Law of Ukraine &#8220;On Integrated Prevention and Control of Industrial Pollution.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I hope this<br \/>\n### **On the Redistribution of Certain Expenditures of the State Budget, Envisaged for the Ministry of Social Policy, Family, and Unity for 2025**<\/p>\n<p>This order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine concerns the redistribution of expenditures of the state budget, envisaged for the Ministry of Social Policy, Family, and Unity for 2025. The essence of the order lies in the redirection of funds within the budget program concerning subventions to local budgets for housing needs.<\/p>\n<p>The structure of the order consists of two points. The first point envisages the redistribution of expenditures under budget program 2511250, namely, a decrease in consumption expenditures and an increase in development expenditures in the amount of UAH 170,900.62 thousand. The second point imposes an obligation on the Ministry of Finance to make appropriate changes to the schedule of the state budget.<\/p>\n<p>The most important provision of this order is the redistribution of funds between consumption expenditures and development expenditures within the framework of the housing subvention program. This may affect how quickly and effectively projects for the construction, reconstruction, and conversion of housing for the formation of temporary accommodation funds will be implemented.<\/p>\n<p>### **On the Allocation of Funds from the Reserve Fund of the State Budget**<\/p>\n<p>This is an order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, which concerns the allocation of funds from the reserve fund of the state budget to eliminate the consequences of a military emergency in the Ternopil region.<\/p>\n<p>**Structure and Main Provisions:**<\/p>\n<p>1.  **Allocation of Funds:** The order provides for the allocation of UAH 30.8 million to the Ternopil Regional State Administration (for the Ternopil Regional Military Administration) to eliminate the consequences of a massive missile and drone attack that occurred on November 19, 2025.<br \/>\n2.  **Financing:** The Ministry of Finance is instructed to make these expenditures on a non-refundable basis from the reserve fund of the state budget.<br \/>\n3.  **Reporting and Control:** The Ternopil Regional State Administration is obliged to approve a list of expenses within a week in coordination with several ministries and submit a report on the use of funds by the end of December 2025.<\/p>\n<p>**Main Provisions for Use:**<\/p>\n<p>*   The order defines a clear mechanism for allocating and using funds from the reserve fund to eliminate the consequences of an emergency situation.<br \/>\n*   It is important to pay attention to the deadlines for approving the list of expenses and submitting the report on the use of funds, as non-compliance with them may lead to violations.<br \/>\n*   The order emphasizes the need<br \/>\nthe importance of coordinating actions between the regional administration and central executive bodies for the effective use of allocated funds.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/go\/1406-2025-%D1%80\"><\/p>\n<h3><strong>On Approval of the Action Plan for Preparation for Associated Participation in the European Union&#8217;s Erasmus+ Programme<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Good day! I am clarifying the main points of this order.<\/p>\n<p>1.  **Essence of the document:**<br \/>\n    The order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine approves the action plan aimed at preparing Ukraine for associated participation in the European Union&#8217;s &#8220;Erasmus+&#8221; programme. This plan defines specific steps and those responsible for their implementation to ensure the successful integration of Ukraine into the &#8220;Erasmus+&#8221; programme.<\/p>\n<p>2.  **Structure and main provisions:**<br \/>\n    The order consists of two parts:<br \/>\n    *   Approval of the action plan.<br \/>\n    *   Determining those responsible for implementing the action plan and establishing reporting procedures.<br \/>\n        The action plan includes the following key areas:<br \/>\n    *   Developing a mechanism for interagency cooperation.<br \/>\n    *   Conducting consultations with EU representatives.<br \/>\n    *   Raising awareness among Ukrainian participants about the programme&#8217;s opportunities.<br \/>\n    *   Analysing the readiness of Ukrainian participants for associated participation.<br \/>\n    *   Determining the institutional status and powers of the National Agency for programme management.<br \/>\n    *   Identifying an independent audit body.<br \/>\n    *   Considering the issue of paying a financial contribution.<br \/>\n    *   Preparing regulatory legal acts.<br \/>\n    *   Preparing a summary report on the results of the preparation.<\/p>\n<p>3.  **Key provisions for use:**<br \/>\n    The most important provisions are measures aimed at:<br \/>\n    *   Creating effective interagency coordination to prepare for participation in the &#8220;Erasmus+&#8221; programme.<br \/>\n    *   Ensuring awareness of Ukrainian organisations and citizens about the opportunities provided by the &#8220;Erasmus+&#8221; programme.<br \/>\n    *   Identifying and preparing the National Agency that will be responsible for managing the programme in Ukraine.<br \/>\n    *   Preparing the necessary regulatory framework to ensure associated participation in the programme.<\/p>\n<p>I hope this explanation helps you better understand the essence of this order.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/go\/1394-2025-%D1%80\"><\/p>\n<h3><strong>On the Transfer of Immovable Property to the Ownership of the Krasnopillia Settlement Territorial Community of the Sumy District of the Sumy Region<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine concerns the transfer of immovable property, namely buildings and structures, including a civil defence shelter, to the ownership of the Krasnopillia settlement territorial community of the Sumy district of the Sumy region.<br \/>\nThe structure of the order is simple: it contains an introductory part that identifies the act, its date of adoption, and the place of publication, as well as the main part that contains the direct order for the transfer of property. The text clearly specifies the list of property, its registration number, area, location address, and cadastral number of the land plot.<\/p>\n<p>The most important provision of this order is the fact of transferring the civil defense protective structure to the ownership of the territorial community. This means that the community is responsible for the maintenance and proper use of this structure.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/go\/1636-2025-%D0%BF\"><\/p>\n<h3><strong>Some Issues of the Ministry of Social Policy, Family and Unity<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Good day! Here is a brief overview of the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine regarding changes in the activities of the Ministry of Social Policy, Family and Unity.<\/p>\n<p>1.  **Essence of the Law:**<br \/>\n    The resolution amends the Regulation on the Ministry of Social Policy, Family and Unity of Ukraine, expanding its powers regarding internally displaced persons (IDPs). The Ministry will now be responsible for the formulation and implementation of state policy regarding the promotion of the realization of the rights and freedoms of IDPs, their support, adaptation, and integration, as well as creating conditions for their voluntary return to their abandoned place of residence.<\/p>\n<p>2.  **Structure and Main Provisions:**<br \/>\n    The resolution amends paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Regulation on the Ministry of Social Policy, Family and Unity of Ukraine. In particular, new subparagraphs are added that define the powers of the ministry in the field of protecting the rights of IDPs, coordinating the activities of authorities, promoting the integration and adaptation of IDPs, and attracting funds from international organizations to support IDPs.<\/p>\n<p>3.  **Most Important Provisions:**<\/p>\n<p>*   **Coordination of activities:** The Ministry coordinates the activities of central and local authorities regarding the protection of the rights and freedoms of IDPs and their social support.<br \/>\n*   **Integration and Adaptation:** The Ministry promotes the integration of IDPs in their new place of residence, their professional and social adaptation.<br \/>\n*   **Living Conditions:** The Ministry coordinates the creation of temporary accommodation facilities and the formation of housing funds for IDPs.<br \/>\n*   **Fundraising:** The Ministry promotes the attraction of funds from international organizations to support IDPs.<\/p>\n<p>These changes are aimed at strengthening the role of the Ministry of Social Policy, Family and Unity in addressing issues related to internally displaced persons and improving their social protection and integration in new communities.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/go\/1634-2025-%D0%BF\"><\/p>\n<h3><strong>On Amendments to the Procedure for Determining Business Entities Engaged in Recovery<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Digest of Legislation Digest of Legislative Changes Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine Regarding the Time Limits for Appealing to the Court for the Recovery of Wages The Constitutional Court declared unconstitutional the three-month limitation for appealing to the court with a claim for the recovery of wages. The court decided that such a&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14000","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ukrainian-legislation-detailed-en","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14000","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14000"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14000\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14000"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14000"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14000"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}