{"id":13856,"date":"2025-12-12T09:09:11","date_gmt":"2025-12-12T07:09:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/2025\/12\/decision-of-the-second-senate-of-the-constitutional-court-of-ukraine-in-the-case-upon-the-constitutional-complaint-of-reinir-business-group-limited-liability-company-regarding-the-conformity-to-th\/"},"modified":"2025-12-12T09:09:11","modified_gmt":"2025-12-12T07:09:11","slug":"decision-of-the-second-senate-of-the-constitutional-court-of-ukraine-in-the-case-upon-the-constitutional-complaint-of-reinir-business-group-limited-liability-company-regarding-the-conformity-to-th","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/2025\/12\/decision-of-the-second-senate-of-the-constitutional-court-of-ukraine-in-the-case-upon-the-constitutional-complaint-of-reinir-business-group-limited-liability-company-regarding-the-conformity-to-th\/","title":{"rendered":"Decision of the Second Senate of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case upon the constitutional complaint of &#8220;Reinir Business Group&#8221; Limited Liability Company regarding the conformity to the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of the provisions of the first paragraph of the third part, the first, second, third paragraphs of the fourth part of Article 23 of the Law of Ukraine &#8220;On the Prosecutor&#8217;s Office&#8221; of October 14, 2014, No. 1697-VII (regarding the representation by a prosecutor of the interests of the state in court)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Certainly, here is the translation of the analysis of the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine:<\/p>\n<p>1.  **Essence of the Decision:** The Constitutional Court of Ukraine considered the issue of the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Law of Ukraine &#8220;On the Prosecutor&#8217;s Office,&#8221; which regulate the representation by a prosecutor of the interests of the state in court. The Court declared some of these provisions unconstitutional, as they allow the prosecutor to excessively interfere in the activities of other authorities and do not ensure legal certainty.<\/p>\n<p>2.  **Structure and Main Provisions:**<br \/>\n    *   The Constitutional Court reviewed the constitutional complaint regarding the first paragraph of the third part and the first, second, and third paragraphs of the fourth part of Article 23 of the Law of Ukraine &#8220;On the Prosecutor&#8217;s Office.&#8221;<br \/>\n    *   The Court recognized as constitutional the first, second, and third paragraphs of the fourth part of Article 23, which establish the procedure for confirming by the court the grounds for representation by the prosecutor of the interests of the state.<br \/>\n    *   The Court declared unconstitutional certain provisions of the first paragraph of the third part of Article 23, which allow the prosecutor to represent the interests of the state in cases where the authority &#8220;does not exercise&#8221; or &#8220;improperly exercises&#8221; the protection of these interests. This decision will take effect on January 1, 2027.<\/p>\n<p>3.  **Key Provisions for Use:**<br \/>\n    *   The decision of the Constitutional Court limits the ability of prosecutors to represent the interests of the state in court on the basis of &#8220;non-exercise&#8221; or &#8220;improper exercise&#8221; of the protection of interests by the relevant authorities.<br \/>\n    *   This decision may affect court cases where prosecutors represent the interests of the state, especially in cases where there is no clear inaction or abuse by the authorities.<br \/>\n    *   Until January 1, 2027, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine must amend the legislation to clearly define the cases when a prosecutor may represent the interests of the state in court to avoid excessive interference in the activities of other authorities.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/go\/v006p710-25\"><strong>Full text by link<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Certainly, here is the translation of the analysis of the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine: 1. **Essence of the Decision:** The Constitutional Court of Ukraine considered the issue of the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Law of Ukraine &#8220;On the Prosecutor&#8217;s Office,&#8221; which regulate the representation by a prosecutor of the interests&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[15,45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13856","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ukrainian-legislation-general-en","category-ukrainian-legislation-important","pmpro-has-access"],"acf":{"patreon-level":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13856","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13856"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13856\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13856"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13856"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexcovery.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13856"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}