1. The subject of the dispute is the lawfulness of the refusal of the Main Department of the Pension Fund of Ukraine in the Odesa Region to recalculate the pension of PERSON_1, taking into account the indexation of monetary allowance.<\/p>\n
2. The Supreme Court emphasized that the indexation of monetary allowance is aimed at maintaining the purchasing power of citizens in the face of rising prices and is an object of indexation of income in the form of a pension, and not the amount of monetary allowance of a serving police officer. The Court noted that the normative legal acts that determine the amount of monetary allowance of police officers do not provide for indexation as an additional type of monetary allowance for recalculation of pensions. The Court indicated that the erroneous inclusion of indexation in the certificate of monetary allowance does not create an obligation for the Pension Fund to take it into account when recalculating the pension. The Court also took into account the previous legal position expressed by the Supreme Court in the ruling of January 30, 2024, in case No. 580\/1974\/23, which concerns the legal nature of indexation.<\/p>\n
3. The Court decided to leave the cassation appeal of PERSON_1 unsatisfied, and the ruling of the appellate court, which refused to satisfy the claim, unchanged.<\/p>\n
**** The court in the decision notes that it deviates from the previous position, which was in other decisions of the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n